.
Order of Contents
Article 1
Books 3
Against Jesuit Teachings 6
.
Article
1600’s
Anon. – The Reformed Catholic, against the Deformed Jesuit, or a Discovering of the Treachery of the Jesuits against the Reformed Churches of France & other Parts ([Netherlands?] 1621) 14 pp.
The author was an inhabitant of La Rochelle, France.
.
Books
1600’s
Bagshaw, Christopher – A Sparing Discovery of our English Jesuits, and of Father Parson’s Proceedings under Pretense of Promoting the Catholic Faith in England, for a caveat to all true Catholics, our very loving brethren and friends, how they embrace such very uncatholic, though Jesuitical designments (London, 1601) 70 pp.
Bagshshaw (d. 1625)
Wadsworth (1604-1656?) was born of an English Jesuit father. In 1625 he professed himself a convert from Romanism to Protestantism, becoming involved with the Church of England.
Anti-Papist – Fair Warning to Take Heed of Popery, or a Short & True History of the Jesuits’ Fiery Practices & Powder-plots to destroy kings, ruin kingdoms & lay cities waste ([London, 1674-79?]) 136 pp.
.
Against Jesuit Teachings
Articles
1600’s
Davenant, John – Question 17, ‘The Papal Jesuits Cannot be Good Subjects’ in The Determinations, or Resolutions of Certain Theological Questions, Publicly Discussed in the University of Cambridge trans. Josiah Allport (1634; 1846), pp. 307-312 bound at the end of John Davenant, A Treatise on Justification, or the Disputatio de Justitia... trans. Josiah Allport (1631; London, 1846), vol. 2
Turretin, Francis – Institutes of Elenctic Theology, tr. George M. Giger, ed. James Dennison Jr. (1679–1685; P&R, 1992)
vol. 1
3rd Topic
13. ‘Is there a middle knowledge in God between the natural and the free? We deny against the Jesuits, Socinians & Remonstrants.’ 212-18
4th Topic
3, ‘Are there conditional decrees? We deny against the Socinians, Remonstrants and Jesuits.’ 316
6th Topic
4. ‘Is providence occupied only in the conservation and sustentation of things; or also in their government (through which God Himself acts and efficaciously concurs with them by a concourse not general and indifferent, but particular, specific and immediate)? We deny the former and affirm the latter, against the Jesuits, Socinians and Remonstrants.’ 501
.
vol. 2
11th Topic
12. ‘Whether it is lawful to use ambiguous equivocations and mental reservations in oaths. We deny against the papists and especially the Jesuits.’ 70
.
Latin Article
Voet, Gisbert – 8. ‘The New Jesuit Skepticism about the Principles of the Christian Faith’ in Select Theological Disputations (Utrecht: Waesberg, 1648), vol. 1, pp. 106-114
.
.
.
Related Pages