The Authority of the Bible

.

Order of Contents

Start
Articles 20+
Books  12+
Latin  4

Historical Theology  6
Autopistia  4
Scripture: Rule of Faith over Nature  5
Inner Testimony of Holy Spirit  1


.

.

Start

Books

Lloyd-Jones, Martyn – Authority  (1958; 1984)  96 pp.  ToC

“Where should you begin?  Read a persuasive, little book by D. Martyn Lloyd Jones titled Authority…  which is a clarion call to return to the authority of Christ, the Word, and the Holy Spirit.” – Joel Beeke

Crampton, Gary – The Bible: God’s Word  Buy  (1989)  170 pp.


.

.

Articles

1300’s

Wyclif, John – On the Truth of Holy Scripture  tr. Ian C. Levy  in TEAMS Commentary Series  (1377-1378; Medieval Institute Publications, 2001), pt. 2

ch. 10, ‘The Authority of the Old Testament’, pp. 148-55
ch. 15, ‘The Authority of Holy Scripture over All Human Writings’, pp. 197-218

.

1500’s

Calvin, John – ‘Of the Power of the Church in Articles of Faith’  17 pp.  being Bk. 4, ch. 8 of The Institutes of the Christian Religion  (1559)

In this masterful treatment, the reformer proves from Scripture that the Church derives all of her authority from the Word, is under it, that the Word is sufficient, and that the Church regulated in doctrine, worship and government by the Word.  One of the best chapters in Calvin’s Institutes.

Musculus, Wolfgang – Common Places of the Christian Religion  (1560; London, 1563)

‘Authority & Excellency of the Canonical Scriptures’  149.a
Augustine, ‘Surely I would not believe the Godpel…’  154.a

Ursinus, Zacharias – 3. Of the Certainty & Authority of the Holy Scripture  in Rules & Axions of Certain Chief Points of Christianity  in A Collection of Certain Learned Discourses…  (d. 1583; Oxford, 1600)

Junius, Francis – Theological Theses for Exercises in Public Disputations in the Famous Academy at Leiden  (1584)

2. On Sacred Scripture
3. Elenctic Theses on Sacred Scripture
4. On the Authority of Holy Scripture
5. On the Authority & Perfection of the Word of God
6. On Traditions

Whitaker, William – 3rd Question – ‘Of the Authority of Scripture’  in A Disputation on Holy Scripture, Against the Papists, Especially Bellarmine & Stapleton  (1588; Cambridge: Parker Society, 1849)

Willet, Andrew – 4th Question – The Authority of the Scriptures  in the First Controversy, the Holy Scriptures  in Synopsis Papismi  (London, 1592)

Rollock, Robert – A Treatise of Effectual Calling  (1603)  in Select Works of Robert Rollock…  (d. 1599; Edinburgh, 1849), vol. 1

7. ‘Outline of the Various Controversies on this Subject.  Is the Scripture the Word of God?’ 63-68
8. ‘Evidence that the Scripture is the Word of God’ 68-75

15. ‘7thCharacteristic—Its Authority as a Judge of Controversies’  94-97
16. ‘8thCharacteristic—Its Authority as a Ground of Faith’  97-99

.

1600’s

Walaeus, Anthony – 2. ‘On the Necessity & Authority of Scripture’  in Synopsis of a Purer Theology: Latin Text & English Translation  Buy  (1625; Brill, 2016), vol. 1, pp. 48-74

Walaeus (1573–1639)

Rutherford, Samuel – Rutherford’s Examination of Arminianism: the Tables of Contents with Excerpts from Every Chapter  tr. Charles Johnson & Travis Fentiman  (1638-1642; 1668; RBO, 2019)

ch. 1, section 1, ‘Whether Scripture is the judge of controversies?  We affirm.  Or, whether God in his Word has not left us any conscience-binding rule, but only one that judges guidingly?  We deny against the Arminians, or Remonstrants.’, pp. 42-44

ch. 16, section 1, ‘Whether all the divine things of the apostles were to be proven to be inspired by the rule of the Word?  We deny with a distinction against the Remonstrants.’, pp. 120-23

Leigh, Edward – ch. 2. Of the Divine Authority of the Scriptures  in A System or Body of Divinity…  (London, A.M., 1654), bk. 1, pp. 5-28

Binning, Hugh – Lecture 3, ‘The Authority & Utility of the Scriptures’  on 2 Tim. 3:16  in The Common Principles of the Christian Religion  in The Works of the Rev. Hugh Binning  ed. Leishman  3rd ed.  (Edinburgh: 1851), pp. 12-16

ed. Schmid, Heinrich – ‘Authority of the Scriptures’  13 pp. being ch. 4, section 8 of Doctrinal Theology of the Evangelical Lutheran Church

This work is a standard anthology of translated quotations from the main orthodox Lutheran theologians of the late-1500’s and 1600’s.

Jacombe, Samuel – ‘The Divine Authority of the Scriptures’  in Puritan Sermons vol. 5

Owen, John

A Short & Plain Answer to Two Questions I. Where was your Religion Before Luther? II. How Know you the Scriptures to be the Word of God?  By a Protestant  (London, 1682)  21 pp.

‘The Testimony of the Church is not the Only, Nor the Chief Reason of our Believing the Scripture to be the Word of God’  in Puritan Sermons, 5.606-648 & in Works, 8.495-543

Turretin, Francis – Institutes of Elenctic Theology, tr. George M. Giger, ed. James Dennison Jr.  (1679–1685; P&R, 1992), vol. 1, 2nd Topic

3. ‘Were the sacred Scriptures written only occasionally and without the divine command?  We deny against the papists.’ 60

4. ‘Are the Holy Scriptures genuine and divine?  We affirm.’ 62

6. ‘From what source does the divine authority of the Scriptures become known to us?  Does it depend upon the testimony of the Church either as to itself or as to us?  We deny against the papists.’  85

20. ‘Whether the Scriptures (or God speaking in them) are the supreme and infallible judge of controversies and the interpreter of the Scriptures.  Or whether the Church or the Roman pontiff is.  We affirm the former and deny the latter against the papists.’ 154-62

21. ‘Are the writings of the fathers the rule of truth in doctrines of faith and in the interpretation of the Scriptures?  We deny against the papists.’  162-69

.

1700’s

à Brakel, Wilhelmus – ch. 43, Proposition 3, ‘The Holy Scriptures are the only rule for doctrine and life’  in The Christian’s Reasonable Service, vol. 2  ed. Joel Beeke, trans. Bartel Elshout  Buy  (1700; RHB, 1992/1999), pp. 653-59

a Brakel (1635-1711) was a contemporary of Voet and Witsius and a major representative of the Dutch Further Reformation.

Howe, John – The Divine Authority of the Scriptures, 5 Lectures  on 2 Tim. 3:16  53 pp.

Boston, Thomas – ‘The Divine Authority of the Scriptures’  on 2 Tim. 3:16  in An Illustration of the Doctrines of the Christian Religion  in Works, vol. 1, pp. 19-37

De Moor, Bernard – Continuous Commentary on Johannes Marckius’ Didactico-Elenctic Compendium of Christian Theology  Buy  (Central, SC: From Reformation to Reformation Translations, 2018), ch. 2, Concerning the Principium of Theology, or Holy Scripture

6. Certainty of the Inspiration & Authority of
7. Scripture’s Authority & Church’s Testimony

40. Supreme Judge: Neither Enthusiastic Experience, nor Reason
41-42. Not the Church, pt. 1, 2
43. Supreme Judge: Holy Spirit

Davies, Samuel – ‘The Divine Authority & Sufficiency of the Christian Religion’  in Sermons, vol. 1 (Philadelphia: Presbyterian Board of Publication, 1864), pp. 71-108

.

1800’s

Payson, Edward – Sermon 49, ‘The Oracles of God’  in Works, 3.11-33

Cunningham, William

Chapters 21-26 on the Authority of Scripture  (1878)  73 pp.  in Theological Lectures, pp. 269-342

Cunningham was one of the great lights of the Free Church of Scotland.

III. ‘What are the Scriptures’  on Jn. 5:39  in Sermons from 1828-1860 (London, 1872; Still Waters Revival, n.d.), pp. 42-57

Robert Dabney – ‘The Bible its Own Witness’‘The Bible its Own Witness’  in Discussions, vol. 1 (Richmond, VA: Presbyterian Committee of Publication, 1890), p. 115 ff.

Girardeau, John – ‘The Authority of the Scriptures’, pp. 385-93  in Discussions of Theological Questions  (1905)

Girardeau (d. 1898) was a lesser known, though important, Southern presbyterian.

.

1900’s

Warfield, B.B. – ‘Scripture’  in A Dictionary of Christ & the Gospels, vol. 2  ed. Hastings, Selbie, Lambert  (Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1908), pp. 584-587  See especially section 9 on pp. 586-7

Murray, John

‘The Infallibility of Scripture’  in Collected Writings, vol. 1, pp. 9-15  Buy  excerpts

‘The Attestation of Scripture’  26 pp.

This is on the required reading list for those in training for the ministry in the American presbytery of the Free Church of Scotland (Continuing).

Ferguson, Sinclair – ‘The Authority, Sufficiency, Finality of Scripture’


.

.

Books

1500’s

Whitaker, William – A Disputation on Holy Scripture, Against the Papists, Especially Bellarmine & Stapleton  (†1595)  742 pp.

Whittaker was an English Puritan.

.

1600’s

Tilenus, Daniel – Positions lately held by the L. Du Perron, Bishop of Eureux, Against the Sufficiency & Perfection of the Scriptures, Maintaining the Necessity & Authority of Unwritten Traditions. Very Learnedly Answered & Confuted…  with a defence of the Sufficiency & Perfection of the Holy Scriptures  (London, 1606)

Tilenus (1563-1633) was a German-French Protestant theologian. Initially Reformed, he became a prominent and influential Arminian teaching at the Academy of Sedan.  He was an open critic of the Synod of Dort of 1618-9.

Ford, Thomas – Logos Autopistos, or, Scriptures’ Self-Evidence to Prove its Existence, Authority, Certainty in Itself & Sufficiency (in its Kind) to Ascertain Others that it is Inspired of God to be the Only Rule of Faith: published as a Plea for Protestants in the Defense of their Profession  (London, 1667)

Ford was a Westminster divine.

Owen, John

Of the Divine Original, Authority, Self-Evidencing Light & Power of the Scriptures; with an answer to that Inquiry, how we may know the Scriptures to be the Word of God.  Also a Vindication of the Purity & Integrity of the Hebrew & Greek Texts of the Old and New Testament; in some considerations on the prolegomena and appendix to the late ‘Biblia Polyglotta.’  Whereunto are subjoined some exercitations about the nature and perfection of the Scripture, the right of interpretation, internal light, revelation, etc.  in Works, 16.281-421

Bk. 6, pt. 1, The Reason of Faith; or, an answer unto that inquiry, ‘Wherefore we believe the Scripture to be the Word of God;’ with the causes and nature of that faith wherewith we do so: wherein the grounds whereon the Holy Scripture is believed to be the Word of God with faith divine and supernatural are declared and vindicated  in Pneumatologia: or, A Discourse concerning the Holy Spirit, Continued  in Works, vol. 4, pp. 1-115

Edwards, John – A Discourse Concerning the Authority, Style, and Perfection of the Books of the Old and New-Testament with a Continued illustration of several difficult texts of scripture throughout the whole work  (London, 1693)  ToC

Edwards (1637-1716) was a reformed Anglican.

.

1700’s

De Moor, Bernard – Didactico-Elenctic Theology, ch. 2, Concerning the Principium of Theology, or Holy Scripture  Buy

.

1800’s

Girardeau, John – ‘The Ultimate Source, Rule & Judge of Theology: The Inspiration of the Scriptures’, pp. 73-393  ToC  in Discussions of Theological Questions  (1905)

Girardeau (d. 1898) was a lesser known, though important, Southern presbyterian.

.

1900’s

Hospers, Gerrit Hendrik – The Reformed Principle of Authority: the Scripture Principle of the Reformation set forth in the Light of our Times  (Grand Rapids: The Reformed Press, 1924)  255 pp.  ToC

ed. Stonehouse, Ned & Paul Woolley – The Infallible Word: a Symposium by the Members of the Faculty of Westminster Theological Seminary  3rd rev. ed.  (Presbyterian & Reformed, 1946)  320 pp.  ToC

“The two most helpful books on biblical authority are The Infallible Word…  the symposium contains an excellent series of Reformed essays dealing with the general character of biblical authority and canonicity.  It concludes by stressing the relevancy and distinctive characteristics of these doctrines as well as the importance of preaching them.” – Joel Beeke

“A carefully reasoned series of essays dealing with the general character of Biblical authority, containing a chapter on the canonicity of the Scriptures, and concluding with an emphasis upon their relevancy, place in preaching, and distinctive characteristics of the Word of God.  By members of the faculty of Westminster Theological Seminary.” – Cyril J. Barber

Geldenhuys, J. Norval – Supreme Authority: the Authority of the Lord, his Apostles & the New Testament  (Eerdmans, 1953)  120 pp.  ToC  Foreward: Ned B. Stonehouse

Ramm, Bernard – The Pattern of Religious Authority  (1957; Eerdmans, 1968)  117 pp.  ToC

“The two most helpful books on biblical authority are…  Bernard Ramm, The Pattern of Religious Authority…  Ramm addresses issues on authority that confront the conservative evangelical.  He distinguishes between the ‘grounds of accepting an authority’ and ‘the right of authority’, and claims that reason, intuition, or inclination are modes of perceiving or receiving an authority but do not constitute the right of the authority received.  He argues that the believer’s doctrine of authority is threefold: the authority of the Scriptures, of the Holy Spirit, and of Christ.  This threefold delineation is contrasted with Roman Catholocism, modernism, and neo-orthodoxy.” – Joel Beeke

Lightner, Robert Paul – The Savior & the Scriptures  Buy  (Philadelphia: P&R, 1966)

“Presents Christ’s view of the Scriptures and stresses His absolute reliance upon the irrevocability of the Word.” – Cyril J. Barber

ed. Boice, James – The Foundation of Biblical Authority  Buy  (1978 / 1979)  170 pp.  ToC  with articles by John Gerstner, James Packer, Francis Schaeffer, R.C. Sproul, etc.

“Helpful articles…  the first major publication of the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy (ICBI), founded in 1977.” – Joel Beeke

Ridderbos, Herman – Studies in Scripture & its Authority  (Eerdmans, 1978)  120 pp.

Henry, Carl – God, Revelation & Authority, vol. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Buy  (Waco, TX: Word Books, 1976-1983)  ToC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Henry was an influential evangelical of the mid-1900’s and professor of theology at Fuller Theological Seminary.

“…contains a massive technical treatment of Biblical authority.” – Joel Beeke

ed. Armstrong, John H. – The Coming Evangelical Crisis: Current Challenges to the Authority of Scripture & the Gospel  (Moody, 1996)  270 pp.  ToC


.

.

Latin

Articles

1600’s

Voet, Gisbert

1. Divinity & Authority of Scripture   in Syllabus of Theological Problems  (Utrecht, 1643), pt. 1, section 1, tract 1   Abbr.

3. ‘How Far the Authority of Scripture Extends Itself’  in Select Theological Disputations  (Utrecht: Waesberg, 1648), vol. 1, pp. 29-47

Wettstein, Gernler & Buxtorf – 2. The Principle of Theology: Sacred Scripture  in A Syllabus of Controversies in Religion which come between the Orthodox Churches & whatever other Adversaries, for material for the regular disputations…  customarily held in the theological school of the academy at Basil  (Basil, 1662), pp. 4-9

.

Book

1600’s

Owen, John – Exercitations for the Sacred Scriptures Against the Fanatics  in Works, 16.424-76


.

.

Historical Theology

Whole of Church History

Rogers, Jack B. & Donald K. McKim – The Authority & Interpretation of the Bible: an Historical Approach  (Harper & Row, 1979)  520 pp.  ToC

.

Early Church

Article

Warfield, B.B. – ‘Augustine’s Doctrine of Knowledge & Authority’  in The Princeton Theological Review, vol. 5, issue 3, July, pp. 353-97  The authority spoken of is specifically Augustine’s trust in Christian revelation, which, of course, can hardly be separated from Scripture

.

Quote on Augustine & Church Authority

Willem van Asselt  in Theology of the French Reformed Churches  (RHB, 2014), pp. 259-60

“…a discussion [by Andrew Rivet in his Isagogue] of the famous adagium [proverb] of Augustine, ‘For my part, I should not believe the gospel except as moved by the authority of the Catholic Church’ (chap. 3).

In this hotly debated issue, Rivet adhered to the orthodox Protestant answer:  Augustine voiced a personal problem relating to his Manichean past, and his adage is not to be viewed as a general rule.”

.

On the Reformation

Articles

Murray, John

‘Calvin & the Authority of Scripture’  in Collected Writings, 4:158-75

‘Holy Scripture’  in Collected Writings, 3:256-62  Excerpt

‘Calvin’s Doctrine of Scripture’  being one of three lectures given under the auspices of the Reformed Fellowship, Inc. in Grand Rapids, Michigan on May 21, 22, 26, 1959 in connection with the commemoration of the 450th anniversary of the birth of John Calvin

Mallinson, Jeffrey – ‘Authentication of Scripture’  in Faith, Reason & Revelation in Theodore Beza, 1519-1605  (Oxford, 2003), pp. 175-207

.

Books

Davies, Rupert Eric – The Problem of Authority in the Continental Reformers: a Study in Luther, Zwingli, & Calvin  Buy  (London: Epworth Press, 1946)  165 pp.  ToC

Reid, J.K.S. – The Authority of Scripture: a Study of the Reformation & Post-Reformation Understanding of the Bible  (NY: Harper, 1957)  280 pp.  ToC

Murray, John – Calvin on Scripture & Divine Sovereignty  (Baker, 1978)  68 pp.  ToC

Fortsman, Henry Jackson – Word & Spirit: Calvin’s Doctrine of Biblical Authority  (Stanford University Press, 1962)  190 pp.  ToC

“…includes a helpful epilogue on ‘Calvin, Calvinism, and the Contemporary Situation’ as well as an excellent bibliography.” – Joel Beeke

.

In Reformed Theology

van den Belt, Henk – The Authority of Scripture in Reformed Theology: Truth & Trust  Pre  Buy


.

.

Autopistia

Quote

Samuel Rutherford

The Divine Right of Church of Government...  (1646), Intro, Section 5, p. 78

“Now we hold that Scripture itself furnishes light and faith of itself, from itself; and that the Church does but hold forth the light: as I see the light of the candle, because of the light itself, not because of the candlestick.”

.

Book

1600’s

Ford, Thomas – Logos Autopistos, or, Scriptures’ Self-Evidence to prove its Existence, Authority, Certainty in itself, and Sufficiency (in its kind) to ascertain others that it is inspired of God to be the only rule of faith: published as a plea for Protestants in the defense of their Profession  (London, 1667)

Ford was a Westminster divine.

.

Historical Theology

Article

van den Belt, Hendrik – Autopistia: the Self-Convincing Authority of Scripture in Reformed Theology’  this is ch.4, ‘Reformed Orthodoxy’, being a survey of the era, from his book below, Autopistia: the Self-Convincing Authority of Scripture in Reformed Theology  (1971)

.

Book

van den Belt, Hendrik – Autopistia: the Self-Convincing Authority of Scripture in Reformed Theology  Pre  (1971)  375 pp.

Abstract:  “Autopistia offers a historical survey and a theological evaluation of the self-convincing character of Scripture in Reformed theology.  Calvin adopted the term autopistos from ancient Greek philosophy and used it to express that faith does not rest on the human authority of the church but on Scripture as the living voice of God.  After discussing the meaning of the term in Reformed Orthodoxy and analyzing the theological position of Benjamin B. Warfield and Herman Bavinck on this issue, HenkVan den Belt draws his theological conclusions in this PhD thesis, advocating a revitalization of the autopistia of Scripture, because it implies that faith finds rest in Scripture itself and not in the external authority of the church or of rational arguments and that Word and Spirit are inseparably connected.”


.

.

Scripture is the Rule of Faith, & How it is so over Nature

Order of Quotes

Chrysostom
Augustine
Ames

.

Early Church

John Chrysostom  (344–407)

Homily on 2 Corinthians 13.4

“Let us not therefore carry about the notions of the many, but examine into the facts.  For how is it not absurd that in respect to money, indeed, we do not trust to others, but refer this to figures and calculation; but in calculating upon facts we are lightly drawn aside by the notions of others; and that too, though we possess an exact balance, and square and rule for all things, the declaration of the divine laws?

Wherefore I exhort and entreat you all, disregard what this man and that man thinks about these things, and inquire from the Scriptures all these things; and having learnt what are the true riches, let us pursue after them that we may obtain also the eternal good things; which may we all obtain, through the grace and love towards men of our Lord Jesus Christ, with Whom, to the Father and the Holy Spirit, be glory, might, and honor, now and ever, and world without end.  Amen.”

.

Augustine of Hippo  (354–430)

The Good of Widowhood, 2

“Whereas, therefore, in every question, which relates to life and conduct, not only teaching, but exhortation also is necessary; in order that by teaching we may know what is to be done, and by exhortation may be incited not to think it irksome to do what we already know is to be done; what more can I teach you, than what we read in the Apostle?

For holy Scripture establishes a rule to our teaching, that we dare not “be wiser than we ought;” but be wise, as he himself says, “unto soberness, according as unto each God hath allotted the measure of faith.” Be it not therefore for me to teach you any other thing, save to expound to you the words of the Teacher, and to treat of them as the Lord shall have given to me.”

.

1600’s

William Ames

From ch. 1  of Bellarminus Enervatus  tr. Charles Johnson

“5.  We accept, secondly, on the topic of a rule:

I.  That the rule or measure of a thing must be marked & easy. Suarez, Metaphysics, pt. 2, distinction II, section 3, because it must be accommodated to the knowledge of a thing.  Therefore, since the Scripture is a rule, it is not obscure and difficult, as the Papists will.

II.  A rule has a parity of proportion to that thing that it is the rule of.  If, therefore, the Scripture is the rule of faith, faith does not extend beyond the Scripture: and therefore, unwritten traditions do not at all pertain to faith.

III.  A rule that is such by its nature has in itself the reason of its exemplary cause, and is therefore prior by nature to the thing it regulates.  If, therefore, the Scripture is the rule of faith, it is indeed prior to faith: if it is prior to faith, then also to the faithful; and if to the faithful, then to the church, which is the congregation of the faithful, and so it is that the Roman church banishes it from that superior place in which it tends to set its own self with some nefarious presumption, as if it were ahead of and above the Scripture.

IV.  A rule consists in something indivisible; that is, so constituted that the least bit is neither increased or diminished.  They therefore violate the Scriptures who join to them their own traditions or abolish anything whatsoever prescribed by them: and the Roman Pontiffs are manifestly possessed of both these evils.

V.  If Scripture is the rule of faith, then those who can err in the exposition of Scripture can indeed err in faith, and commend a false rule of faith to others. That, however, the Pope and the Roman church interpret many parts of Scripture insipidly and impiously is so manifest that it need not be proven.  Therefore, the Roman Pontiff may shamefully err in his decrees, even concerning faith and morals.

VI.  Since such is the nature of this rule, that it be a precept, anything admitted without the direction of this rule, of what species soever it otherwise be, is anomalous, and an aberration: and therefore, as much the supererogations of the Papists as their many dogmas (concerning the worship of images and creatures, purgatory, the mass itself, and the Roman Pontiff) must be acknowledged to necessarily be mere error.

VII.  Since the Scripture is not indeed a single precept, but a system of precepts respecting the same thing (namely, that we live well to God), it is necessary that it contain within itself the whole doctrine of theology: therefore, what thing sover the Roman Pontiff obtrudes without Scripture must be alien to true theology.

VIII.  Finally, since it is the rule of faith, they must be enemies of the faithful who snatch that rule from their hands.

6. We accept those qualities conceded to Scripture from Bellarmine, that it is a certain and stable rule of faith. For:

I.  If it is, in itself, a certain rule, then it can leave us certain of the will of God, without the definitions of the church.

II.  Then all uncertainties, the lie of men, are by the decree of God to be examined according to that rule.

III.  Then it does not admit various and uncertain senses.

IV.  Then a certain determination is to be sought from Scripture of all controversies which are stirred up concerning the faith.

V.  If it is indeed a stable rule, then nothing is necessary to be believed by us, or useful, which was unknown in the age of the apostles.

VI.  Then the dispensations of the Papists are pernicious impostures.

VII.  Then, finally, the stability of the church entirely depends upon this: if it constantly adheres to this rule.”

.

Articles

1600’s

Martindale, Adam – 1st Doubt, ‘If the Scripture be a perfect rule, how can the light of nature be of any use in spiritual matters?’  in ch. 1, ‘Of the Scriptures, & by the Way, of the Light of Nature’  in Divinity-Knots Unloosed: or a Clear Discovery of Truth; by Resolving Many Doubts according to Scripture, Orthodox Divines & Sound Reason  (London, 1649), pp. 1-2

Martindale (1623-1686) was an English presbyterian minister who had taken the Solemn League & Covenant.

.

1700’s

De Moor, Bernard – 32. ‘Proximate End of: Rule of Faith & Practice’  in ch. 2, Concerning the Principium of Theology, or Holy Scripture  in Continuous Commentary on Johannes Marckius’ Didactico-Elenctic Compendium of Christian Theology  Buy  (Central, SC: From Reformation to Reformation Translations, 2018)

.

Latin Article

Heidegger, Johann H. – sections 5-8  in Locus 1, ‘On Theology in General’  in A Marrow of the Marrow of Christian Theology, in Favor & in Use in Tyron  (Zurich, 1697), pp. 2-4

.

.

On the Inner Testimony of the Holy Spirit:  Historyical Theology

Herman Bavinck

Reformed Dogmatics,  vol. 1, pp. 584-85

“This doctrine [of the inner testimony of the Holy Spirit] was opposed, however, from the side of Sociniaism, Remonstrantism, and Romanism.  And gradually the doctrine of the internal testimony began to lose its place of honor even in Reformed theology.

Already in Turretin, Amyrald, Molina, et al., it was weakened and identified with the so-called illumination of the Holy Spirit by which the intellect is enabled to note the marks and criteria of the divinity of the Holy Scripture. Faith no longer connects directly and immediately with Scripture but is the product of insight into the marks of truth and divinity it bears. Inserted between Scripture and faith, then, are the marks of the truth of Scripture.

This occurred first in the sense that the recognition of those criteria was attributed to an illumination of the intellect by the Holy Spirit.  But rationalism soon also considered this illumination unnecessary, assigned the study of the truth of revelation to reason, and base[d] the authority of Scripture on historical proofs.  Even orthodox theologians scarcely dared any longer to speak of the internal testimony [Wilhelmus A’Brakel and Johannes Marck are cited as examples].”

.

.

.

Related Pages