Cessationism

“Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city…  to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy….”

Dan. 9:24

And He shall be for a sanctuary; but for a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offence to both the houses of Israel…  Bind up the testimony, seal the law among my disciples….  To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.”

Isa. 8:14,16,20

“And this voice which came from heaven we heard, when we were with Him in the holy mount [Mt. 17].  We have also a more sure word of prophecy…  knowing this first, that no prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation.”

2 Pet. 1:18-20

.

.

Subsections

Apostles, Prophets & Evangelists
Prophecy
Prophets in 1 Cor. 14 & Scripture Expositing as “Prophesying”
Tongues
Miracles
7 Sacraments of Romanism  on Confirmation & Extreme Unction

.

.

Order of Contents

Charismatic Gifts
Cessation of
.    Articles
.    Books
.    Quotes
.    Jewish
.    Book of Acts
.          Acts 8:14-17
.    1 Corinthians
.          1 Cor. 13:8-13
.     Latin
.     Biblios

History
.     Early Church
.     Montanism
.     Reformation
.     Westminster & Puritans
.     Scottish Continuationism?
.     Quotes

Webpages  3


.

.

On the Charismatic Gifts Generally

Encyclopedias & Dictionaries

ed. McClintock & Strong – ‘Gifts, Spiritual’  in Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature  (1867-1887)

ed. Hastings – ‘Charismata’  in Encyclopaedia of Religion & Ethics, vol. 3  (1908-1927)

Not every interpretation in the article is recommended, but it has a lot of detailed, helpful information.

International Standard Bible Encyclopedia – ‘Spiritual Gifts’

.

Articles

1600’s

Carter, William – ‘Manifestations of God unto his People in the Last Days’  being pp. 67-90  of The Covenant of God with Abraham, Opened. Wherein 1. The Duty of Infant-Baptism is Cleared. 2. Something Added Concerning the Sabbath, and the Nature & Increase of the Kingdom of Christ. Together with a Short Discourse Concerning the Manifestations of God unto his People in the Last Days. Wherein is Showed the Manner of the Spirit’s Work Therein to be in the Use of Ordinary Gifts, not by Extraordinary Revelations  (1654)

Owen, John – ‘Extraordinary Spiritual Gifts, 1 Cor. 12:4-11’ in A Discourse of Spiritual Gifts in Works, vol. 4

van Mastricht, Peter – vol. 1, bk. 1, ch 2, section 33  of Theoretical-Practical Theology  (RHB)

.

1700’s

Barrington, John Shute – Essay 1, ‘On the Teaching & Witness of the Holy Spirit’  (†1734)  255 pp.  in Theological Works, vol. 1

Barrington (1678–1734) was an Anglican who was friendly to presbyterians.  His discussion of the particular spiritual gifts begins on p. 23.  The work is not polemical but seeks to organize and explain the Biblical data on the spiritual gifts, their uses, purposes, etc.

.

1800’s

Henderson, Ebenezer – Lecture 4, ‘The Gifts of Inspiration’  in Divine Inspiration, pp. 175-234  (1836)  See especially where the various gifts are individually treated on p. 186 ff.


.

.

The Cessation of the Charismatic Gifts

.

Articles

1500’s

Luther, Martin – pp. 206-8  on Mk. 16:16-17  in ‘Day of Christ’s Ascension into Heaven’, 2nd Sermon, on Mk. 16:14-20  in The Precious & Sacred Writings of Martin Luther…  ed. John N. Lenker  (Minneapolis, MN: Lutherans in All Lands Co., 1907), vol. 12, Church Postil, Gospels: Pentecost or Missionary Sermons, vol. 3

.

1600’s

Rutherford, Samuel – ch. 7, ‘Of Revelations & Inspirations’  in A Survey of the Spiritual Antichrist (London, 1648), part 1

Owen, John

‘The Original, Duration, Use & End of Extraordinary Spiritual Gifts’  in A Discourse of Spiritual Gifts in Works, vol. 4

pp. 248-9 & 282 of Commentary on Hebrews, ch. 2:4

.

1800’s

Smeaton, George – ‘On the Extraordinary Gifts’  3 paragraphs

Smeaton was a professor in the Free Church of Scotland.

Dabney, Robert

pp. 227-55  of ‘Prelacy a Blunder’  in Discussions, vol. 2

Prelacy has sometimes taken the ‘charismata’ to be a gifting and anointing of the Holy Spirit conferred by the laying on of hands in ordination, in order to justify apostolic succession, etc.

Dabney, on the contrary, shows that it certainly does not mean this, but is to be taken for the extraordinary spiritual giftings of the Holy Spirit, conveyed by the laying on of the apostles hands, which hence has ceased with the apostles.  He also discusses the unique nature of the Biblical evangelists.  His discussion is important and very insightful.

‘Spurious Religious Excitements’  in Discussions, vol. 3, p. 456 ff.

.

1900’s

Warfield, B.B.

‘The Cessation of the Charismata’  (1918)  32 paragraphs  This is the most important section of Warfield’s book, Counterfeit Miracles, being ch. 1.

‘Can Dreams Convey a Revelation?’  in The Bible Student. Continuing the Bible Student & Religious Outlook.  vol. 4, New Series, (Nov. 1901), no. 5, pp. 241-50

Edgar, Thomas – ‘The Cessation of the Sign Gifts’  1988  50  paragraphs

Edgar has been a professor of New Testament Literature and Exegesis at Capital Bible Seminary, Lanham, Maryland.

Masters, Peter – ‘Cessationism — Proving Charismatic Gifts have Ceased’

Stewart, Angus – ‘The Three Waves of Charismatic Christianity’

Allen, Matthew – ‘Excited Utterances: A Historical Perspective On Prophesy, Tongues and Other Manifestations of Spiritual Ecstasy’  (2004)

Macleod, Donald – ‘The Cessation of the Charismatic Gifts with the Apostolic Age’  in The Baptism of the Spirit & the Charismatic Gifts

Schwertley, Brian – ‘The Charismatic Movement: a Biblical Critique’  85 paragraphs


.

.

Books

1700’s

Warburton, William – The Doctrine of Grace, or the Office & Operations of the Holy Spirit Vindicated from the Insults of infidelity & the abuses of Fanaticism  (1763)  270 pp.

“Officers in the apostolic church were of two kinds, extraordinary and ordinary.   See Eph. 4:11; 1 Cor. 12:28, and compare, for the grounds upon which the extraordinary are defined to be temporary, 1 Cor. 13:10, etc., with Warburton’s exposition of the passage in his ‘Doctrine of Grace’ [Bk. 2, ch. 2].” – Thomas Peck

.

1800’s

Shearer, John – Modern Mysticism; or the Covenants of the Spirit, their Scope & Limitations  (Richmond, 1905)  ToC

Shearer (1832-1919) was a confessional presbyterian minister and the eighth president of Davidson College, NC.  He wrote numerous good and orthodox books.

“We do not profess to teach anything new.  We consider the teaching of the Westminster Confession of Faith and other standards of the Reformed Churches to be absolutely true and sufficient, as they set forth the gracious operations of the Holy Spirit in redemption.

We do hope, however, to set up and maintain the traditional view as taught in them, by treating the subject from a different point of view, and in refutation of heresies that were not prominently before the minds of those who formulated these standards.

Our aim is to ascertain and classify all the works of the Holy Spirit in all ages and dispensations, and to differentiate them one from the other by accurate definition; and also to determine, from the Scriptures, which have been permanent and universal and will be till the end of time, and which were limited and temporary.  So far
as we know, this ground has not been traversed, nor indeed has its importance been appreciated.

Having accomplished this, as we hope and believe, we then bring the more popular claims of Modern Mysticism to the test of ascertained principles, and then consider their special pleas based on the Scriptures.

The thoughtful reader may perhaps find it profitable to read ‘Summary I’ at the close before reading the discussion.”

.

1900’s

Ward, Rowland

Spiritual Gifts in the Apostolic Church: Their Nature, Function & Cessation in the Light of the New Testament Evidence  Buy  (1972)

Blessed by the Presence of the Spirit: The Authentic Charismatic Church  Ref  (New Melbourne Press, 1997)  96 pp.

“A careful cessationist case with exposition of relevant Scripture.”

Chantry, Walter – Signs of the Apostles: Observations on Pentacostalism Old & New  Buy  (1973)  131 pp.

Gaffin Jr., Richard – Perspectives on Pentecost  Buy  (1979)  122 pp.

Judisch, Douglas – An Evaluation of Claims to the Charismatic Gifts  Buy  (Baker & Concordia Seminary Press, 1985)  96 pp.

Judisch is a Lutheran

.

2000’s

Budgen, Victor – The Charismatics & the Word of God  Buy  (2001)  316 pp.

Pennington, Tom – A Biblical Case for Cessationism: Why the Miraculous Gifts of the Spirit Have Ended  (G3)  214 pp.


.

.

Order of Quotes

Muratorian Fragment
Origen
Eusebius
Chrysostom
Theodoret
Gregory the Great

Calvin
Edwards
Rutherford
Watson
Henry
Edwards
Hodge

.

.

Quotes

More similar quotes may be found in William Whitaker’s Disputation on Holy Scripture (pp. 297, 333, 337, 346, 355, 358, 445, 577) & Robert Baillie’s Dissuasive from the Errors of the Time by searching for ‘revelation’.

.

Early Church

The Muratorian Fragment  (AD 170)

“Hermas wrote the Shepherd very recently, in our times, in the city of Rome, while his brother, bishop Pius, sat in the chair of the Church of Rome.  Therefore it also ought to be read, but it cannot be read publicly in the church to the people, nor placed among the prophets–as their number is complete—nor among the apostles, for it is after [their] time.”

.

Origen  (185-253)

Against Celsus, bk. 7, ch. 11  in ANF 4:615

“…to set forth the divine inspiration of the prophecies; but we have according to our ability, in our commentaries on Isaiah, Ezekiel, and some of the twelve minor prophets, explained [them] literally and in detail…

And Celsus is not to be believed when he says that he has heard such men prophesy; for no prophets bearing any resemblance to the ancient prophets have appeared in the time of Celsus.  If there had been any, those who heard and admired them would have followed the example of the ancients, and have recorded the prophecies in writing.”

.

Eusebius  (c. 260/265 – 339)

Church History, bk. 5, ch. 16, sections 3-4, 7-8, 10-12  in NPNF2 1:231-32.  The following is from an account of an unnamed 2nd century observer.

“I have hesitated till the present time, not through lack of ability to refute the falsehood or bear testimony for the truth, but from fear and apprehension that I might seem to some to be making additions to the doctrines or precepts of the Gospel of the New Testament, which it is impossible for one who has chosen to live according to the Gospel, either to increase or to diminish.

But being recently in Ancyra in Galatia, I found the church there greatly agitated by this novelty, not prophecy, as they call it, but rather false prophecy, as will be shown.  Therefore, to the best of our ability, with the Lord’s help, we disputed in the church many days concerning these and other matters separately brought forward by them, so that the church rejoiced and was strengthened in the truth, and those of the opposite side were for the time confounded, and the adversaries were grieved…

Their opposition and their recent heresy which has separated them from the Church arose on the following account…  a recent convert, Montanus [fl. 157-172] by name…  And he became beside himself, and being suddenly in a sort of frenzy and ecstasy, he raved, and began to babble and utter strange things, prophesying in a manner contrary to the constant custom of the Church handed down by tradition from the beginning.  Some of those who heard his spurious utterances at that time were indignant, and they rebuked him as one that was possessed, and that was under the control of a demon, and was led by a deceitful spirit, and was distracting the multitude; and they forbade him to talk, remembering the distinction drawn by the Lord and his warning to guard watchfully against the coming of false prophets…

For the faithful in Asia met often in many places throughout Asia to consider this matter, and examined the novel utterances and pronounced them profane, and rejected the heresy, and thus these persons were expelled from the Church and debarred from communion.

Since, therefore, they called us slayers of the prophets because we did not receive their loquacious prophets, who, they say, are those that the Lord promised to send to the people…”

.

Chrysostom   (c. 347 – 407)

On 1st Corinthians, Homily 29, on 12:1-2  in NPNF1 12:168

“This whole place is very obscure: but the obscurity is produced by our ignorance of the facts referred to and by their cessation, being such as then used to occur but now no longer take place.  And why do they not happen now?  Why look now, the cause too of the obscurity has produced us again another question: namely, why did they then happen, and now do so no more?

…Well, what did happen then?  Whoever was baptized he straightway spake with tongues and not with tongues only, but many also prophesied, and some also performed many other wonderful works.”

.

Theodoret of Cyrus  (c. 393 – c. 458/466)

Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians, 240.43, on 1 Cor. 12:1, 7.  Cited in ed. Gerald Bray, I-II Corinthians  in Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture: New Testament VII  (IVP, 2006), p. 117

“In former times those who accepted the divine preaching and who were baptized for their salvation were given visible signs of the grace of the Holy Spirit at work in them.  Some spoke in tongues which they did not know and which nobody had taught them, while others performed miracles or prophesied.  These Corinthians also did these things, but they did not use the gifts as they should have done.  They were more interested in showing off than in using them for the edification of the church…

Even in our time grace is given to those who are deemed worthy of holy baptism, but it may not take the same form as it did in those days.”

.

Gregory the Great

Homily 29 on the Gospels, on the Ascension, May 24, 591

“4. The text continues: ‘And these are the signs that will accompany those who believe: in my name they will cast out demons, they will speak new tongues, they will take snakes in their hands, and if they drink any deadly beverage, it will not will do them any harm.  They will lay hands on the sick, and they will be healed.’ [Mk. 16:17]

That, my brethren, you do not do; does that mean you do not believe?  No, of course!  These signs were necessary at the beginning of the Church.  Faith, in order to grow, had to be nourished.  We, too, when planting trees, pour water on them until we have found that they have resumed; but once their roots are fixed in the ground, we stop watering them.  Hence Paul’s words: ‘Languages ​​are a sign, not for believers, but for unbelievers.’ (1 Cor 14:22)”

.

1500’s

John Calvin

Commentary on 1 Corinthians 12, verse 28

“By this term [‘prophets’ in this passage] he means (in my opinion) not those who were endowed with the gift of prophesying, but those who were endowed with a peculiar gift, not merely for interpreting Scripture, but also for applying it wisely for present use.

My reason for thinking so is this, that he prefers prophecy to all other gifts, on the ground of its yielding more edification — a commendation that would not be applicable to the predicting of future events.  Farther, when he describes the office of prophet, or at least treats of what he ought principally to do, he says that he must devote himself to consolation, exhortation, and doctrine.  Now these are things that are distinct from prophesyings.

Let us, then, by ‘prophets’ in this passage understand, first of all, eminent interpreters of Scripture, and farther, persons who are endowed with no common wisdom and dexterity in taking a right view of the present necessity of the Church, that they may speak suitably to it, and in this way be, in a manner, ambassadors to communicate the divine will.”

.

Commentary on 1 Thess. 5, verse 20

“By the term ‘prophecy’, however, I do not understand the gift of foretelling the future, but as in 1 Cor. 14:3, the science of interpreting Scripture, so that a prophet is an interpreter of the will of God.  For Paul, in the passage which I have quoted, assigns to prophets teaching for edification, exhortation, and consolation, and enumerates, as it were, these departments. Let, therefore, ‘prophecy’ in this passage be understood as meaning: interpretation made suitable to present use.”

.

1600’s

Thomas Edwards

The First & Second Part of Gangræna, or, A Catalogue & Discovery of Many of the Errors, Heresies, Blasphemies & Pernicious Practices of the Sectaries of this Time…  (London, 1646), pp. 15, 28

“The Catalogue of the Errors, Heresies, Blasphemies, is as follows:


144.  That there are revelations and visions in these times, yea to some they are more ordinary, and shall be to the people of God, generally within a while.

145.  That the gift of miracles is not ceased in these times, but that some of the sectaries have wrought miracles, and miracles have accompanied them in their baptism, etc. and the people of God shall have power of miracles shortly.

146.  That anointing the sick with oil by the Elders praying over them, with laying on of hands [James 5], is a Church-ordinance for Church-members that are sick, for their recovery.

147. ‘Tis ordinary for Christians now in these days, with Paul to be rapt up to the third Heavens, and to hear words unutterable, and they cannot well have assurance of being Christians, that have not found and had experience of this.”

.

Samuel Rutherford

The Due Right of Presbyteries  (1644), pt. 2, p. 301

“3. Multitude of prophets may consist with the time when seers and foretellers of things revealed in visions were beginnings to cease, even as the gifts of the Holy Ghost given abundantly at the Pentecost, Acts 2:17-18; Joel 2:28, did consist with the time when things concerning Christ must now have an end, Lk. 22:37; 24:44.”

.

Thomas Watson

The Beatitudes…  (London: Smith, 1660), ch. 1, p. 4

“[In the context of the NT and ministerial callings:] Sure, there is as much need of ordination now, as in Christ’s time, and the time of the apostles, there being then extraordinary gifts in the Church which are now ceased.”

.

Matthew Henry

Commentary on 1 Corinthians 12, verses 1-11

“The apostle comes now to treat of spiritual gifts…  namely, extraordinary offices and powers, bestowed on ministers and Christians in the first ages, for conviction of unbelievers and propagation of the gospel.”

.

Jonathan Edwards

‘Love More Excellent than the Extraordinary Gifts of the Spirit’  on 1 Cor. 13:1-2

“The extraordinary gifts of the Spirit, such as the gift of tongues, of miracles, of prophecy, etc., are called extraordinary, because cause they are such as are not given in the ordinary course of God’s providence.  They are not bestowed in the way of God’s ordinary providential dealing with his children, but only on extraordinary occasions, as they were bestowed on the prophets and apostles to enable them to reveal the mind and will of God before the canon of Scripture was complete, and so on the primitive Church, in order to the founding and establishing of it in the world.

But since the canon of the Scripture has been completed, and the Christian Church fully founded and established, these extraordinary gifts have ceased.”

.

Charles Hodge

An Exposition of the First Epistle to the Corinthians  (NY: Robert Carter, 1860), on 1 Cor. 12:28, p. 263

“Secondly, every office necessarily supposes the corresponding gift.  No man could be an apostle without the gift of infalibility; nor a prophet without the gift of inspiration; nor a healer of diseases without the gift of healing.  Man may appoint men to offices for which they have not the necessary gifts, but God never does, any more than he ordains the foot to see or the hand to hear.  If any man, therefore, claims to be an apostle, or prophet, or worker of miracles, without the corresponding gift, he is a false pretender.  In the early church, as now, there were many false apostles, i.e. those who claimed the honor and authority of the office without its gifts.

 Thirdly, the fact that any office existed in the apostolic church is no evidence that it was intended to be permanent.  In that age there was a plenitude of spiritual manifestations and endowments demanded for the organization and propagation of the church, which is no longer required.  We have no longer prophets, nor workers of miracles, nor gifts of tongues.  The only evidence that an office was intended to be permanent is the continuance of the gift of which it was the organ, and the command to appoint to the office those who are found to possess the gift.”


.

.

On the Jewish Thought during & After Jesus’s Time

Articles

1800’s

Edersheim, Alfred – Appendix 14, ‘The Law in Messianic Times’  in The Life & Times of Jesus the Messiah (1883; Longmans, Green & Co., 1912), vol. 2  pp. 764-67

.

1900’s

Abrahams, Israel – ch. 14, ‘The Cessation of Prophecy’  in Studies in Pharisaism & the Gospels, First & Second Series  (1917 / 1924; Ktav Publishing House, 1967), 2nd Series, pp. 120-29

See the review of this volume, ‘Two books by a Jewish scholar’ in The Churchman, ‘Reviews of Books’, pp. 227-330.


.

.

On the Book of Acts

See also many more commentaries on Acts.

.

Bruner, Frederick Dale – A Theology of the Holy Spirit: The Pentecostal Experience & the New Testament Witness  Buy  (1970)  350 pp.

Dr. Bruner was a graduate of Princeton Seminary and the University of Hamburg.

The first half of the book is a description of the Pentecostal movement and experience from their primary sources.  The second half of the book (why you need to buy it) is the best exegetical consideration available of the key primary texts throughout Acts that relate to modern Pentecostal issues.  Brunner even-handedly argues from the text that the ‘tongues’ of Acts were real languages, argues for cessationism and that Pentecostal theology and practice is not reflective of the experience and teaching of the book of Acts.  His treatment of Acts 2 and 1 Cor. 14 is masterly.

“Haled by reviewers, this book is one of the best analyses of Pentecostalism written in the twentieth century.  Dr. Gordon Clark called it ‘masterly’, ‘exceedingly well researched’, ‘superb’, and a ‘penetrating analysis’.  No one, whether sympathetic or unsympathetic to the Pentecostal-Charismatic movement, should be without it.” – The Trinity Foundation

.

.

On Acts 8:14-17, that Conferring Miraculous Gifts to Others was a Prerogative of the Apostles 

See especially Warfield.

.

1600’s

Lightfoot, John – pp. 125-28 of Commentary on Acts in Works, vol. 8

.

1800’s

Meyer, Heinrich – Commentary on Acts 8:14-17

Gloag, Paton J. – p. 289 of A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Acts

.

1900’s

Warfield, B.B. – pp. 21-25 of Counterfeit Miracles


.

.

On 1st Corinthians

See also many more commentaries on 1 Corinthians.

.

1800’s

Hodge, Charles

‘The Nature of Tongues’  from his Commentary on 1 Corinthians, 12:10, five paragraphs

Argues for the traditional interpretation that Biblical “tongues” were real, intelligible, foreign languages, not unintelligible babble.

An Exposition of 1 Corinthians  Buy  (1860)  Reformed, Princeton

***  “The more we use Hodge, the more we value him.  This applies to all his commentaries.” – Spurgeon

.

1900’s

Clark, Gordon – First Corinthians  Buy

Clark was reformed, focuses on exegesis, is very clear and is sometimes humorous.  Clark is very good on rightly understanding the charismatic phenomenon from the text.

Thomas, Robert – Understanding Spiritual Gifts: A Verse-by-Verse Study of 1 Corinthians 12-14  Buy  (1998)  304 pp.

Thomas was a professor of New Testament at The Master’s Seminary and is a dispensationalist (which system of interpretation is highly not-recommended, though they get cessationism right).

.

.

1 Cor. 13:8-13

‘The perfect’ that is to come (v. 10), which will do away with the temporary and partial miraculous gifts of the Holy Spirit, has often, or perhaps usually, been taken by historic, reformed commentators as Christ in his revelatory 2nd coming, such interpreters still holding to cessationism for exegetical and systematic reasons from other passages of Scripture.

Rev. Phil Kayser notes that if the passage does refer to the second coming there is still plenty of exegetical reason from the passage itself to believe that the gifts would expire to cessation shortly after the apostolic period much before the 2nd Coming.  See pp. 46-50 of The Canon of Scripture.

However, the immediate and dominant context of 1 Cor. 12-14 is that of inspired, special revelation for the Church for its upbuilding, and not the coming of Christ, which notion is otherwise absent.  Hence, against this strong background of piecemeal, localized, temporary and ephemeral revelatory gifts, there is strong prima facie reason to understand the ‘perfect’ as the full, completed, permanent canon of Scripture, as the Word of God is called in Scirpture ‘perfect’ (Ps. 19:7; 119:96; James 1:25), a glass that shows us the glory of the Lord (2 Cor. 3:15-18) and a mirror that shows us as we truly are (James 1:23-35).

Scripture also gives a perfect understanding of all that is good and spiritually necessary for us to walk before the Lord (Lk.1:3; 2 Tim. 3:16-17; Acts 18:26; 22:3; Rom. 12:2; 1 Cor. 2:6; 2 Cor. 7:1; 2 Cor. 13:9,11; Gal. 3:3; Eph. 4:11-13; Phil. 3:15; Col. 1:28; Col. 4:12; 1 Thess. 3:10; Heb. 6:1; 13:21; James 1:4,17; 3:2; 1 Pet. 5:10; 1 John 2:5), it being sufficient and able to make us ‘perfect’ through every good work (2 Tim. 3:16-17).

With this in mind, the cessationist reading of 1 Cor. 13 deserves full consideration.  Budgen’s treatment is one of the best.

.

1700’s

Warburton, William – bk. 2, ch. 2, ‘An Explanation of 1 Cor. 13:8, showing, from the express declaration of the apostle, that the extraordinary or miraculous operations of the Holy Spirit were to Cease with the First Ages’  (1763)  10 pp.  in The Doctrine of Grace, or the Office & Operations of the Holy Spirit Vindicated from the Insults of infidelity & the abuses of Fanaticism, pp. 70-80

“Officers in the apostolic church were of two kinds, extraordinary and ordinary.   See Eph. 4:11; 1 Cor. 12:28, and compare, for the grounds upon which the extraordinary are defined to be temporary, 1 Cor. 13:10, etc., with Warburton’s exposition of the passage in his Doctrine of Grace.” – Thomas Peck

.

1800’s

Henderson, Ebenezer – Concluding Lecture, ‘The Cessation of Revelation, 1 Cor 13:8’  in Divine Inspiration  (1836), pp. 510-42

.

Contemporary

Budgen, Victor –  Ch. 5, ‘When do the Gifts Cease’  (2001)  16 pp.  in The Charismatics & the Word of God, pp. 73-89  Buy

Very helpful exegesis.

McDougall, Donald – ‘Cessationism in 1 Cor. 13:8-12’  Master’s Theological Seminary 14/2 (Fall 2003), pp. 177-213

Compton, R. Bruce – ‘1 Cor. 13:8-13 & the Cessation of Miraculous Gifts’  (2004)  48 pp.

Compton is a professor at Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary.

Woods, Andy – “The Meaning of ‘The Perfect’ in 1 Cor. 13:8-13”  (2012)  69 paragraphs

Dr. Woods is a graduate of Dallas Theological Seminary.


.

.

Latin

1600’s

Voet, Gisbert

Syllabus of Theological Problems  (Utrecht, 1643), pt. 1, section 2, tract 5   Abbr.

1. Of the Charismatic Gifts in General
2. Of the Charismatic Gifts in Specific(of Miracles, Healings, Exorcism, Prophecy, Languages & Interpretation)

Select Theological Disputations  (Utrecht: Waesberg, 1655)

vol. 2

69. ‘Of Spiritual Gifts [Charismatis]’, pp. 1086-110
70. ‘On the Testing of Spirits’, pp. 1100-33
71. Pt. 2, pp. 1133-41

vol. 4

47. ‘A Disquisition on Thomas, Part 1 of Part 2, Questions 68-70, of the Gifts, Blessings & Fruits of the Spirit’, pp. 729-39


.

.

Bibliographies

Swanson, Dennis – ‘Bibliography of Works on Cessationism’  17 pp., 5 sections

Swanson is a librarian for The Master’s Seminary.  The bibliography includes numerous general works and works that are pro-Continuationism, as well as about the Pentecostal and Charismatic movements generally.

Jones, Charles Edwin

Guide to the Study of the Pentecostal Movement, 2 vols.  Buy  (Scarecrow  1983)

The Holiness-Pentecostal Movement: A Comprehensive Guide  Buy  ATLA Bibliography Series

The Charismatic Movement: A Guide to the Study of the NeoPentecostalism with Emphasis on Anglo-American Sources, 2 vols.  Buy  (Scarecrow, 1995)

Black Holiness: A Guide to the Study of Black Participation in Wesleyan Perfectionist & Glossolalic Pentecostal Movements  Buy  Atla Bibliography Series


.

.

History

.

On the Early Church

Articles

Kaye, John – pp. 88-102 & ‘Appendix to Ch. 2’  of The Ecclesiastical History of the Second & Third Centuries: Illustrated from the Writings of Tertullian  (1845)

Bernard, J.H. – ‘The Miraculous in Early Christian Literature’  (1891)  43 pp

Busenitz, Nathan – ‘The Gift Of Tongues: Comparing the Church Fathers with Contemporary’  Masters Seminary Journal 17, no. 1 (Spring 2006), pp. 61-78

.

Books

Middleton, Conyers

Abridged: A Free Inquiry into the Miraculous Powers which are Supposed to have Subsisted in the Christian Church, from the earliest ages through several successive centuries upon the authority of the primitive fathers  (1749)  180 pp.  Unabridged  405 pp.

Middleton (1683-1759) was an Anglican clergyman.

“After a century and a half the book remains unrefuted, and, indeed, despite the faults arising from the writer’s spirit and the limitations inseparable from the state of scholarship in his day, its main contention seems to b put beyond dispute.” – B.B. Warfield

See Warfield, Counterfit Miracles, pp. 28-31 for more background to these works.

A Vindication of the Free Inquiry…  from the objections of Dr. Dodwell & Dr. Church  (1751)  98 pp.


.

.

Montanism – Early Church

Articles

ed. McClintock & Strong – ‘Montanists’  in Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological & Ecclesiastical Literature  (1867-1887)

Stewart, Angus – ‘Was the Church Right to Condemn Montanism?’


.

.

On the Reformation

Pak, G. Sujin – The Reformation of Prophecy: Early Modern Interpretations of the Prophet & Old Testament Prophecy  Pre  (Oxford University Press, 2018)  365 pp.  ToC


.

.

On Westminster & the Puritans

Milne, Garnet – The Westminster Confession of Faith and the Cessation of Special Revelation: the Majority Puritan Viewpoint on Whether Extra-Biblical Prophecy is Still Possible  Buy  (2007)  362 pp.

This is an excellent, exhaustive historical defense of the cessationism of the Westminster Confession and Assembly, in light of some who believe the Confession allows for “Reformed Charismatics.”  Milne proves the historical claims of Wayne Grudem, regarding reformed history and continuationism (especially with regard to the reformers and Scottish puritans), wrong.  The book also explores the interesting variety of expressions and nuances of the cessationist doctrine amongst the puritans, for which it is chiefly valuable.


.

.

Scottish Continuationism?

Contemporary

Milne, Garnet –  Ch. 6, ‘Prophecy and the Scots’  (2007)  37 pp.  in The Westminster Confession of Faith & the Cessation of Special Revelation: the Majority Puritan Viewpoint on Whether Extra-Biblical Prophecy is Still Possible, pp. 219-56  Buy

This is the best and most detailed treatment of the topic.

“The durability of the view that Reformation and post-Reformation ‘prophecy’ was mediate revelation as an application of Scripture to providence by the leading of the Spirit is seen most clearly where Westminster theology took hold and had its greatest success…”

.

1600’s

Gillespie, George

ch. 5, ‘Whether these prophets and prophesyings in the primitive church, 1 Cor. 14; 12:28; eph. 4:11; were extraordinary and not so to continue; or whether they are precedents for the preaching or prophesying of such as are neither ordained ministers nor probationers for the ministry’  in A Treatise of Miscellany Questions

Gillespie is arguing against the Independents who claimed that their practice of unordained lay-preaching was warranted from the ‘prophets’ and ‘prophesying’ of the NT,, which they took to include gifted, non-ordained lay-persons.

In the midst of the discussion, Gillespie expresses his belief that the NT prophets were extraordinary and inspired, and that at the Reformation and afterwards such persons, whom he in part names in a list, were raised up with gifts greater than that of ordinary pastors.  He does not express though, that ‘prophet’ is a continuing office in the church or ordinary thereto, or fallible.

As Gillespie regards the phenomenon as extraordinary and ceased in most periods of the church, his view is very different than that of most Continuationists.  Gillespie, while using the NT verses of ‘prophets’ as proof-texts for cessationism in other parts of his writings, wonders here whether these Scriptures may bear the additional nuance of including the non-inspired, modern, Reformation ‘prophets’ that Gillespie cites:

“and upon what Scripture can we pitch for such extraordinary prophets, if not upon those Scriptures…?”

Gillespie’s implicit premise seems to be: Finding the accounts of the Reformation ‘prophets’ to be self-evidently true, he seeks Scriptural warrant for them, for it would be strange for God to give ‘prophets’ to his continuing Church, and yet for Scripture not to mention such at all.  Therefore, perhaps this modern phenomenon may be grounded in these specific Scriptures?

Garnet Milne, p. 247:

“Thus a careful analysis of Gillespie’s wider thought brings Gillspie far more nearly into line with his cessationist colleagues at the Assembly than may have been supposed by recent scholars such as Berends.  Nothing that Gillespie concludes necessarily separates him from the majority view of the Reformed orthodox.  He appeals to the same texts which others applied  earlier to immediately-inspired prophets, but these texts, as we have seen, can also be used to justify a later non-miraculous though otherwise analogous gift of the Holy Spirit, as John Own and other Westminster divines maintained.  Neither does anything Gillespie says preclude an explanation like Rutherford’s of the Knoxian foretellers- namely that modern ‘prophets’ were applying Scripture principles to providential circumstances under the leading of the Holy Spirit.

None of the Scottish commissioners, including Blair and Gillespie, therefore, needs to be understood as a proponent of a continuing immediate revelation.  Indeed, there is insufficient evidence to allow that conclusion concerning any of them.”

ch. 7, ‘Of Prophets & Evangelists: in what Sense their work & vocation might be Called Extraordinary, & in what sense Ordinary’  in A Treatise of Miscellany Questions

Gillespie takes’prophets and evangelists’ as having both extraordinary and ordinary aspects and functions.  The offices are not ordinary to the continuing Christian church, but upon extraordinary occasions, ecclesiastical assemblies may commission persons for the ordinary work of messengers to make communications with other assemblies.

Yet Gillespie does not see the office of evangelist as having a permanent place in the church or that there is warrant for them having a distinct ordination, and what he describes as their continuing functions takes place in historically reformed denominations already, such as the Free Church of Scotland (Continuing), which, from the Second Reformation in Scotland, never inherited an office of the NT evangelist.

Rutherford, Samuel

p. 126  of A Peaceable and Temperate Plea, Ch. 10  (1642)

pp. 138 (bot)-141  of The Covenant of Life Opened  (1655)

ch. 7, ‘Of Revelations & Inspirations’  in A Survey of the Spiritual Antichrist, part 1.  Quote from pp. 42-44:

“There is a third [category of] revelation of some particular men, who have foretold things to come… as John Hus, Wyclif, Luther, have foretold things to come, and they certainly fell out, and in our nation of Scotland, Mr. George Wishart…  Mr. Knox…  Mr. John Davidson…  [and] diverse holy and mortified preachers in England have done the like…  now the differences…  I place in these:

1. These worthy reformers did tie no man to believe their prophecies as Scriptures, we are to give faith to the predictions of prophets and apostles, foretelling facts to come, as to the very word of God; they never gave themselves out as organs immediately inspired by the Holy Ghost, as the prophets do, and as Paul did…  yea they never denounced judgment against those that believe not their predictions, of these particular events and facts as they are such particular events & facts, as the prophets and apostles did…

2. The events revealed to godly and sound witnesses of Christ are not contrary to the Word…  They had a general rule going along that ‘evil shall hunt the wicked man’: only a secret harmless, but an extraordinary strong impulsion of a Scripture-spirit leading them, carried them to apply a general rule of divine justice, in their predictions to particular godless men, they themselves only being foretellers not copartners of the act.

3. They were men sound in the faith opposite to Popery, Prelacy Socinianism, Papism, Lawless Enthusiasm, Antinomianism, Arminianism, Arianism, and what else is contrary to sound doctrine, all these being wanting in such as hold this fourth sort of revelations we cannot judge them but Satanical having these characters. 1 They are not pure and harmless; but thrust men on upon bloody and wicked practices forbidden by God…”

.

Quotes

John Knox

Works, vol. 3, pp. 168-9

“My assurances are not the Marvels of Merlin, nor yet the dark sentences of profane prophesies, but:

1. the plain truth of God’s Word;

2. the invincible justice of the everlasting God, and

3. the ordinary course of his punishments and plagues from the beginning are my assurance and grounds.  God’s Word threatens destruction to all unobedient; his immutable justice must require the same.  The ordinary punishments and plagues show examples.”

.

Samuel Rutherford

A Survey of the Survey of that Sum of Church Discipline  (London, 1658), p. 472

“Mr. Hooker [a congregationalist]:  ‘If government by independent congregations be insuf­ficient because it authorizes not persons to be pastors over pagans, government by synods is sick of the same disease.’

[Rutherford’s] Answer:  [1.] We judge the essence of a pastor not to stand in the call and choice of those to whom they are pastors; for it makes Paul, Barnabas and the apostles to be no pastors to the gen­tiles and to the heathen, to whom they preach, and [it] makes the apostles as apostles to be no pastors.

[Margin Note:] Evangelists are now ceased as well as a­postles.

2.  Synods from Acts 15 and Acts 13 may lend men, autho­rized with pastoral power, to heathens to spread the Gospel; and private men as no pastors, but as private men, are intruders [though] authorized by Mr. Hooker, for they have no promise, such as pastors have by Mt. 28:19-20; Mk. 16:15-17; Jer. 1:6,17-18, to plant Churches among the heathens; nor is there a warrant to say that evangelists are ordinary officers left by Christ to plant Churches.

If Richard Hooker have any ground from Eusebius or Scri­pture for evangelists now, or in Trajan’s time, he must show that they have the gift of tongues: for how could evangelists be fellow-helpers to preach the Gospel to the Churches planted by the apostles if they were not an extraordinary office only?  See those divines in the margin, and my learned and dear bro­ther, Mr. George Gillespie, Miscellaneous Questions, ch. 7.  If the Church should send any to the heathen any way rip[…] for the Gospel, these could be no other than ordinary pastors to them.

[Margin Note:]  Tilen, Syntagma, dis. 19, th. 38, Apostolorum vice, ubi res poscebat, fun­gebantur. Professors of Leided, in Synopsis of Pure Theology, dis. […], thesis 17, p. 605; Bucan, in loc., Com. 42, q. 45; Calvin, Commentary on Eph. 4, Apostolis proximi erant Evangelistae, & munus affine habe­bant.  Bullinger, ibid., In plebe potissimum e […]udienda; Zanchi, Com. ibid. Apostolorum Co­mites—non immediate mi […]—sed assumebantur.  Dr. Robert Boyd from Trochoregia, Commentary on Eph. 4, p. 493, Apostolorum Comites modo huc, modo illuc missi, modo re vocati ab Apostolis, extraordinarii.”

.

Thomas M’Crie, The Story of the Scottish Churchpp. 20-23.  See also Robert Blair’s opinion on p. 123.

“…[George] Wishart was basely betrayed into the hands of the cardinal by the earl of Bothwell, under a pledge of personal safety…  and after a mock trial, during which he was grossly insulted, mocked, and even spit upon by his judges, he was condemned to the stake as an obstinate heretic.  The crimes of which he was accused were, such as denying… inventions of the Romish Church; and he defended himself with great meekness and fidelity…

He was fixed to the stake with a heavy chain.  The fire was lighted…  ‘This flame hath scorched my body,’ said the sufferer,

‘yet hath it not daunted my spirit.  But he who from yonder high place beholdeth us with such pride, shall, within a few days, lie in the same as ignominiously as now he is seen proudly to rest himself.’

This happened on the 1st day of March, 1546.  Nothing could be more unlikely, at the time Wishart uttered this memorable prediction, than that it should be fulfilled.  The cardinal himself paid no regard to it; he dwelt securely in his fortified castle; the people of the town were at his command; and he had so powerful friends throughout the country.

A late writer is so perfectly sure that our ancestors could, in no instance, receive premonitions of future events, that he maintains it to be ‘more probable’ that Wishart was privy to some conspiracy against the cardinal, ‘than that he should be endowed with the spirit of prophecy.’

But is there anything inconsistent with reason or religion in supposing that God may, on special occasions, such as in times of hot persecution, have granted to his faithful and prayerful servants premonitions and forewarnings of coming events, beyond what could be discovered even by ‘an extraordinary degree of sagacious foresight?’  ‘That the Supreme Being,’ says Dr. Cook, ‘may, in seasons of difficulty, thus enlighten his servants, cannot b doubted.’

To hold that this opinion is inconsistent with the perfection of the Holy Scriptures, is to mistake the matter entirely.  Our worthies never pretended to be endowed with the spirit of prophecy, in the sense in which this is true of the ancient prophets; thy did not lay claim to inspiration, nor require implicit faith to be placed in their sayings as divine; thy did not propose them as rules of duty, nor appeal to them as miraculous evidences of the doctrines thy taught.  But they regarded such presentiments as gracious intimations of the will of God, granted to them in answer to prayer, for their own encouragement or direction; and they delivered them as warnings to others, leaving the truth of them to be ascertained and proved by the event…

The truth is… [regarding] the cardinal… his assassination was the result of a more private conspiracy which was formed some time after Wishart’s death…  not exceeding twelve persons in all.  early on the morning of Saturday, 29th May, 1546, this small band… burst into the chamber of the cardinal, and after upbraiding him with his perfidy and cruelty, fell upon him with their swords…  and the conspirators…  exposed his dead body on the very tower from which he had, a few months before, in savage pomp, witnessed the execution of George Wishart.”


.

.

Quotes

at Covenant Protestant Reformed Church

‘The Church Fathers on Speaking in Tongues’

Calvin, John – 3 Quotes


.

.

Webpages with Further Resources

The Highway.com: The Charismatic Movement  23 articles

The Ultimate Cessationism Resource

Cessationism.org

.

.

.

“Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.”

3rd Commandment

“But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak…  even that prophet shall die.  And if thou say in thine heart, ‘How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken?’  When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously…”

Dt. 18:20-22

“In that day there shall be a fountain opened to the house of David…  for sin and for uncleanness.  And it shall come to pass in that day, saith the Lord of hosts, that…  I will cause the prophets and the unclean spirit to pass out of the land.  And it shall come to pass, that when any shall yet prophesy, then his father and his mother that begat him shall say unto him, ‘Thou shalt not live; for thou speakest lies in the name of the Lord’: and his father and his mother that begat him shall thrust him through when he prophesieth.  And it shall come to pass in that day, that the prophets shall be ashamed every one of his vision, when he hath prophesied…  But he shall say, ‘I am no prophet…'”

Zech. 13:1-5

.

.

.

Related Pages

Sealing of the Spirit

On the Nature of the Prophets in 1 Cor. 14 & Expositing the Scriptures as “Prophesying”