“For in Him we live, and move, and have our being…”
Acts 17:28
.
.
Subsections
God as Pure Act
Perception
Beauty
.
.
Order of Contents
Start Here
Articles 6
Books 4
Anthology
Aristotelian, Thomistic, Scholastic & Neo-Thomist
. On Suarez
Particular Issues
Historical
Latin 12
. Particular Issues 2
.
Start Here
Articles
Fulford, Andrew – ‘The Metaphysics of Scripture’ (2014) 16 paragraphs at Calvinist International
Feser, Edward – ch. 2, ‘Metaphysics’ in Aquinas: a Beginner’s Guide (Oneworld, 2009), pp. 16-58
.
Book
Feser, Edward – Scholastic Metaphysics Buy (Editiones Scholasticae, 2014) 290 pp. ToC
Feser is a Romanist professor of philosophy. By ‘scholastic’ is meant high medieval scholasticism up through 1600’s Romanism, but specifically the viewpoint of Thomas Aquinas. Feser is a neo-Thomist, that is, one who defends as true the basic outlook and categories of Thomas’s metaphysics (generally derived and amplified from Aristotle), but with some updates according to natural knowledge in the modern context.
The first chapter of the book refutes ‘scientism’, the belief that all knowledge can only be derived through the scientific method. The book is highly recommended for the topic, and gives a very persuasive exposition (at the beginning of each of the chapters) for the necessity of the basic, traditional distinctions and categories of Aristotelian and scholastic metaphysics.
Traditional, natural metaphysics is so commonly used by reformed theologians in their writings, especially in Latin, in the Post-Reformation era, that understanding this subject is a necessity for both historical theology and for the truth of the matter itself.
Here is a review of Feser’s book by Andrew Fulford at Calvinist International.
.
Articles
1600’s
Gale, Theophilus
Bk. 1, ch. 3, ‘The Vanity of Metaphysics, or Natural Theology, & Divination’ in The Court of Gentiles, Part III, The Vanity of Pagan Philosophy Demonstrated from its Causes, Parts, Proprieties & Effects… (London, 1677)
Bk. 2, ch. 1, ‘Of Metaphysic or Prime Philosophy in General’ in The Court of the Gentiles, Part IV, Of Reformed Philosophy, wherein Plato’s Moral & Metaphysic or Prime Philosophy is Reduced to an Useful Form & Method (London, 1677), pp. 210-14
Gale (1628–1678) was an English educationalist, nonconformist and Independent theologian of dissent, who tutored Ezekiel Hopkins and was an ally of Thomas Goodwin.
“…to disabuse the minds of men, who have been so long imposed on by false ideas, collected out of Aristotle’s supposed Metaphysics.”
.
2000’s
Duby, Steven J.
“Reformed Catholicity & the Analogy of Being” in ed. Joseph Minich, Reforming the Catholic Tradition: The Whole Word for the Whole Church (Davenant Press, 2019)
“Further Thoughts on Natural Theology, Metaphysics, & Analogy” in Pro Ecclesia, vol. 30, issue 3 (2021)
Fulford, Andrew & David Haines – “The Metaphysics of Scripture” in ed. Joseph Minich, Philosophy & the Christian: The Quest for Wisdom in the Light of Christ (Davenant Press, 2018)
Haines, David – “Biblical Interpretation & Natural Knowledge: A Key to Solving the Protestant Problem” in ed. Joseph Minich, Reforming the Catholic Tradition: The Whole Word for the Whole Church (Davenant Press, 2019)
.
Books
Hasker, William – Metaphysics: Constructing a Worldview in Contours of Christian Philosophy (IVP, 1983) 125 pp. ToC
Dolezal, James – All that is in God: Evangelical Theology & the Challenge of Christian Theism (Reformation Heritage Books, 2017)
Duby, Steven J. – God in Himself: Scripture, Metaphysics, & the Task of Christian Theology (IVP Academic, 2019)
ed. Haines, David, Without Excuse (Davenant Press, 2020)
See the articles by B. J. Mauser, Nathan Greeley, J. T. Bridges, Andrew Payne, and others.
.
Anthology
Drennen, D.A. – A Modern Introduction to Metaphysics: Readings from Classical & Contemporary Sources (NY: Free Press, 1962) 765 pp. ToC
.
Aristotelian, Thomistic, Scholastic & Neo-Thomist Metaphysics
Articles
Feser, Edward – ch. 2, ‘Metaphysics’ in Aquinas: a Beginner’s Guide (Oneworld, 2009), pp. 16-58
Lowe, E.J. – ch. 10, ‘Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics: a Brief Exposition & Defense’ in ed. Edward Feser, Aristotle on Method & Metaphysics (Palgrave, 2013), pp. 196-205
.
Books
Coffey, P. – Ontology, or the Theory of Being: an Introduction to General Metaphysics (Longmans, 1914) 450 pp. ToC
Preface: “…an English text-book on General Metaphysics from the Scholastic standpoint… the Moderate Realism of Aristotle and the Schoolmen is assumed throughout.
…few if any serious attempts have yet been made to transpose these [historical, scholastic, metaphysical] questions from their medieval setting into the language and context of contemporary philosophy. Perhaps not a single one of these problems is really and in substance alien to present-day speculations. The author has endeavored, by his treatment of such characteristically ‘medieval’ discussions as those on Potentia [Power] and Actus [Act], Essence and Existence… to show that the issues involved are in every instance as fully and keenly debated–in an altered setting and a new terminology–by recent and living philosophers of every school of thought as they were by St. Thomas and his contemporaries in the golden age of medieval scholasticism.”
Grenier, Henri – Thomistic Philosophy, vol. 2 (Metaphysics) 2nd impression (Charlottetown, Canada: St. Dunstan’s University, 1948-50)
Anderson, James F. – An Introduction to the Metaphysics of St. Thomas Aquinas: Texts Selected & Translated… (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1953) 150 pp. ToC
Gardeil, H. D. – Introduction to the Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 4 (Metaphysics) trans. John A. Otto (St. Louis: B. Herder Book Co., 1967) 345 pp. ToC
The second half of the book contains organized, topical selections from Thomas’s writings.
Doig, James C. – Aquinas on Metaphysics: a Historico-Doctrinal Study of the Commentary on the Metaphysics (Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1972) 425 pp. ToC
ed. Feser, Edward – Aristotle on Method & Metaphysics (Palgrave, 2013) ToC
Feser, Edward – Scholastic Metaphysics Buy (Editiones Scholasticae, 2014) 290 pp. ToC
Feser is a Romanist professor of philosophy. By ‘scholastic’ is meant high medieval scholasticism up through 1600’s Romanism, but specifically the viewpoint of Thomas Aquinas. Feser is a neo-Thomist, that is, one who defends as true the basic outlook and categories of Thomas’s metaphysics (generally derived and amplified from Aristotle), but with some updates according to natural knowledge in the modern context.
The first chapter of the book refutes ‘scientism’, the belief that all knowledge can only be derived through the scientific method. The book is highly recommended for the topic, and gives a very persuasive exposition (at the beginning of each of the chapters) for the necessity of the basic, traditional distinctions and categories of Aristotelian and scholastic metaphysics.
Traditional, natural metaphysics is so commonly used by reformed theologians in their writings, especially in Latin, in the Post-Reformation era, that understanding this subject is a necessity for both historical theology and for the truth of the matter itself.
Here is a review of Feser’s book by Andrew Fulford at Calvinist International.
.
.
Bibliography
Olivero, Mark – ‘Moderate Realism & Christian Theology, with a Beginner’s Guide to Thomistic Thinking, Compiled by Mark Olivero’ (2021) 3 pp. 10 steps
Olivero is reformed.
.
On Franciscus Suarez
Intro
Suarez (1548–1617) was a Spanish Jesuit priest, philosopher and theologian, one of the leading figures of the School of Salamanca movement, and is generally regarded among the greatest scholastic, metaphysicians after Thomas Aquinas.
William Ames below has a short work broadsiding Suarez; on the other-hand, Jacob Revius reissued Suarez’s main work on the topic, his Metaphysical Disputations, mostly approvingly, with his own continual comments and corrections (or purgations). Rutherford, in his Latin works, often disputes against Suarez where the matters touch on theology and theological paradigms, that is, where philosophy and theology meet.
.
Select Secondary Works
eds. Salas, Victor M. & Robert L. Fastiggi – A Companion to Francisco Suarez (Brill, 1999) 385 pp. ToC
Ch. 9 is on ‘Suarez’s Influence on Protestant Scholasticism: the Cases of Hollaz [Lutheran] & Turretin’.
Interpreting Suarez: Critical Essays Buy (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012) 228 pp.
Daniel Heider – Aristotelian Subjectivism: Francisco Suárez’s Philosophy of Perception in Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, #28 Buy (Springer, 2021) 315 pp.
.
Translations of Suarez
A Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics… trans. John P. Doyle (Marquette Univ. Press, 1950) 420 pp. ToC
The Metaphysical Disputations
On Various Kinds of Distinctions trans. Cyril Vollert Buy (Marquette Univ. Press, 1947)
Metaphysical Disputation I: On the Nature of First Philosophy or Metaphysics in Early Modern Catholic Sources Buy (Catholic University of America Press, 2021) 464 pp.
Francis Suarez on Individuation: Metaphysical Disputation V: Individual Unity & its Principle trans. Jorge J.E. Garcia in Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation Buy (Marquette Univ. Press, 1982) 304 pp.
Metaphysics of Good & Evil According to Suarez: Metaphysical Disputations X & XI & Selected Passages from Disputation XXIII & Other Works (Analytica) Buy (Philosophia Verlag, 1989) 294 pp.
On the Formal Cause of Substance: Metaphysical Disputation XV in Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation Buy (Marquette Univ. Press, 2000)
On Efficient Causality: Metaphysical Disputations 17, 18 & 19 trans. Alfred Freddoso in Yale Library of Medieval Philosophy Series Buy (Yale Univ. Press, 1994) 448 pp.
On Creation Conservation & Concurrence: Metaphysical Disputations 20-22 trans. A.J. Freddoso Buy (St. Augustines Press, 2002) 368 pp.
The Metaphysical Demonstration of the Existence of God: Metaphysical Disputations 28-29 Buy (St. Augustine Press, 2004) 240 pp.
On Real Relation: Disputatio Metaphysica XLVII: a Translation from the Latin, with an Introduction & Notes trans. John P. Doyle in Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation Buy (Marquette Univ. Press, 2006) 431 pp.
Francis Suarez on Beings of Reason, Metaphysical Disputation LIV in Medieval Philosophical Texts in Translation Buy (Marquette Univ. Press, 1994) 170 pp.
.
Particular Issues
On Distinctions
Articles
Muller, Richard – Dictionary of Latin & Greek Theological Terms: Drawn Principally from Protestant Scholastic Theology 1st ed. (Baker, 1985)
‘distinctio’
‘modus subsistendi’
‘realis’
Feser, Edward – Scholastic Metaphysics (2014), pp. 80-87
1.3.1, ‘The Scholastic Theory of Distinctions’
1.3.2, ‘Aquinas versus Scotus & Suarez’
Cross, Richard – 3.2.2, ‘Varieties of Distinctions’ in Union & Communion: Christology & Metaphysics in the Seventeenth Century (2022), pp. 43-46
.
On God’s Being
Dolezal, James – God without Parts: Divine Simplicity & the Metaphysics of God’s Absoluteness (Pickwick Publications, 2011)
.
On the Origin of Life
Fulford, Andrew
‘The Metaphysics of Biogenesis’ (2014) 14 paragraphs
This article surveys the metaphysical argument of Dr. David S. Orderberg (a neo-Thomist) for why a naturalized biogenesis, or life arising from non-living matter, cannot on principle happen.
Oderberg distinguishes between ‘immanent causation’ and ‘transient causation’. Immanent causation, a characteristic of all living things, is a “causation that originates with an agent and terminates in that agent for the sake of its self-perfection.” Immanent causation involves:
“1. Homeostasis: living things regulate themselves internally and thereby preserve themselves.
2. Metabolism: the living being takes in external matter/energy and uses it to sustain itself.
3. Adaptation: the organism changes its internal condition so as to maintain itself in its environment.”
Transient causation is where “the activity terminates in something distinct from the agent.” Oderberg argues that transient causation can never, by definition, arise so as to become immanent causation.
.
On Transcendentals
Transcendentals, such as unity, can be, and are necessarily, predicated of each and every being. Universals on the other hand, may not be predicated of everything, but have at least one instance, and may have many instances, such as animal, redness, or ability to play the piano.
.
Articles
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy – ‘Medieval Theories of Transcendentals’
Strunk, Nathan R. – ‘Is the Doctrine of the Transcendentals Viable Today? [Yes] Reflections on Metaphysics & the Doctrine of the Transcendentals’ (2011) 10 pp. at The Metaphysical Society of America
.
Books
Aertsen, Jan
Medieval Philosophy & the Transcendentals: The Case of Thomas Aquinas Ref (Brill, 1996) 468 pp.
“Students of Thomas Aquinas have so far lacked a comprehensive study of his doctrine of the transcendentals. This volume fills this lacuna, showing the fundamental character of the notions of being, one, true and good for his thought.”
Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought: From Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) to Francisco Suárez [d. 1617] Pre Ref (Brill, 2012) 705 pp. ToC
“This book provides for the first time a complete history of the doctrine of the transcendentals, from its beginning in the “Summa de bono” of Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) up to its most extensive systematic account in the “Metaphysical Disputations” of Francisco Suárez (1597)… Metaphysics is called “First Philosophy”, not because it deals with the first, divine being, but because it treats that which is first in a cognitive sense, the transcendental concepts of “being”, “one”, “true” and “good”.” – bookflap
.
On Universals & Particulars
Transcendentals, such as unity, can be, and are necessarily, predicated of each and every being. Universals on the other hand, may not be predicated of everything, but have at least one instance, and may have many instances, such as animal, redness, or ability to play the piano.
.
Articles
Loux, Michael – “Perspectives on the Problem of Universals” Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale (2007), 18:601-22
Galluzzo, Gabriele – “The Problem of Universals & Its History. Some General Considerations” Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale (2008), 19:335-69
Chiaradonna, Riccardo & Galluzzo Gabriele – ‘Introduction’ in Universals in Ancient Philosophy (Edizioni Della Normale, 2013)
Galluzzo, Gabriele – ‘Universals in Aristotle’s Metaphysics’ in Universals in Ancient Philosophy (Edizioni Della Normale, 2013)
Wanless, Brandon L. – ch. 8, ‘Universality & Particularity’ in Universality & the Divine Essence: St. Thomas Aquinas on the Unity Characteristic of the Trinitarian Persons a Masters thesis (University of St. Thomas, 2015), pp. 72-84
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy – ‘The Medieval Problem of Universals’
.
Books
Lawande, G.N. – The Problem of Universals: a Metaphysical Essay (Bombay: New Book Co., 1943) 235 pp. ToC
Lawande is a Platonic idealist who argues against Aristotle. For a summary of his view see the second paragraph of the foreward.
Shwayder, D.S. – Modes of Referring & the Problem of Universals: an Essay in Metaphysics (University of California Press, 1963) 170 pp. ToC
Butchvarov, Panayot – Resemblance & Identity; an Examination of the Problem of Universals (Indiana Univ. Press, 1966) 230 pp. ToC
ed. van Iten, Richard J. – The Problem of Universals (Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970) 310 pp. ToC
This is an anthology of texts through the Western tradition.
ed. Landesman, Charles – The Problem of Universals (NY: Basic Books, 1971) 315 pp. ToC
This is an anthology of modern philosophers on the topic.
ed. Spade, Paul – Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham (Hackett Publishing, 1994) 250 pp. ToC
eds. Chiaradonna, Riccardo & Galluzzo Gabriele – Universals in Ancient Philosophy Ref (Edizioni Della Normale, 2013) Introduction Most of the chapters in this book are on Academia.edu under their respective authors.
Heider, Daniel – Universals in Second Scholasticism: a Comparative Study with Focus on the Theories of Francisco Suárez S.J. (1548-1617), João Poinsot O.P. (1589-1644)… Buy (John Benjamins Publishing Co., 2014) 355 pp.
eds. Galluzzo, Gabriele & Michael Loux – The Problem of Universals in Contemporary Philosophy Abstract (Cambridge University Press, 2015)
eds. Di Bella, Stefano & Tad M. Schmaltz – The Problem of Universals in Early Modern Philosophy Pre (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017) 345 pp. ToC
.
On Participation
See the section on our page on Creation.
Koterski, Joseph W. – ‘The Doctrine of Participation in Thomistic Metaphysics’, pp. 185-96
Koterski is a Jesuit.
.
On Individuation
Primary Sources
Francis Suarez on Individuation: Metaphysical Disputation V: Individual Unity & its Principle trans. Jorge J.E. Garcia in Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation Buy (Marquette Univ. Press, 1982) 304 pp.
Revius, Jacobus – Suarez Repurged, or a Syllabus of the Metaphysical Disputations of Francis Suarez, a Theologian of the Society of Jesus, with the Notes of Jacob Revius… (Leiden: 1644)
4. Of transcendental unity in common 48
5. Of individual unity & its principle 67
6. Of formal & universal unity 75
7. Of general varieties of distinctions 98
Revius (1586-1658) was a reformed, professor of philosophy at Leiden who was anti-Cartesian.
Burgersdijck, Franco – Institutions of Metaphysics in Two Books... last ed., largely emended (Hague, 1657), bk. 1
8. On Uncircumscribed Principles, or on Essence & Existence 49
9. On Circumscribed Principles of Metaphysics 57
10. On the Affections of Being in General 59
11. On Unity & Multiplicity in General 61
12. On Numerical & Formal Unity, & on the Principle of Individuation 66
13. On Universal Unity 75
14. On Species & Grades of Unity 82
15. On Diversity or Distinction, & Convenience 87
16. On Opposition 95
Burgersdijck (1590-1635) was a Dutch, reformed logician and professor of moral and natural philosophy. He was also earlier a professor of philosophy at the French University of Saumur.
Adama, Lollius – A Metaphysical Disputation on the Principle of Individuation (Franeker, 1606) 83 theses
Adama (c.1544-1609) was a reformed professor of philosophy at Franeker.
.
Secondary Sources
Article
Garcia, Jorge & Jonathan Vajda – ‘Individuation & the Realism/Nominalism Dilemma: The Case of the Middle Ages’ Abstract International Philosophical Quarterly
.
Book
King, Peter & Jorge J. E. Gracia – Introduction to the Problem of Individuation in the Early Middle Ages (Catholic University of America Press, 1984) 300 pp. ToC
.
On Teleology
Truman, Carl – Appendix 1, ‘The Role of Aristotelian Teleology in Owen’s Doctrine of Atonement’ in The Claims of Truth: John Owen’s Trinitarian Theology (Paternoster, 1998), pp. 233-40
.
On Causality
‘The Inescapable Law of Causality’ (2014) 3 paragraphs This is an extended quote from Edward Feser. ‘PSR’ is the Principle of Sufficient Reason, which is very related to the Principle of Causality.
.
On Good & Evil
Oderberg, David – The Metaphysics Of Good And Evil (Routledge, 2020) 495 pp. ToC
Oderberg is an Analytical Thomist.
.
On Eternity, Time & the Past
Article
Courtenay, William J. – ‘John of Mirecourt & Gregory of Rimini on Whether God Can Undo the Past’ in Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale, vol. 40 (Jan-Dec, 1973), pp. 147-74
Cross, Richard – ‘Duns Scotus on Eternity and Timelessness’
Faith & Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers, vol. 14, issue 1 (1997), article 1, pp. 3-25
.
Book
Dolnikowski, Edith Wilks – Thomas Bradwardine: A View of Time and a Vision of Eternity in Fourteenth-Century Thought (Studies in the History of Christian Thought) (Studies in the History of Christian Traditions) Buy (Brill, 1997) 364 pp.
.
On Quantity
Bruno, Francesca – The Quantity Debate in Late Medieval & Early Modern Europe: a Question at the Intersection of Physics, Metaphysics & Theology (Cornell Univ., 2019) 165 pp.
Abstract: “My dissertation aims to challenge the standard narrative in post-Kantian histories of philosophy and science about the 17th century shift from Aristotelianism to mechanism as involving a fundamental reconceptualization of continuous quantity, or extension, and material substance, and as creating a deep divide between the ‘modern’ and ‘medieval’ periods. On that view, René Descartes’ understanding of extension as the nature of material substance is seen as one of the hallmarks of that shift. I show that, in fact, (a) late medieval philosophers did not hold one uniform theory of extension but a rich, wide array of views; and (b) a deeper continuity underpins Descartes’ metaphysics and the views of (some) late medieval philosophers. To this end, I examine in detail the views of three representative 14th century thinkers: William Ockham, John Buridan, and Nicole Oresme; and the implications of their views for Descartes’
metaphysics.
For each of these authors, I aim to answer the following questions: (1) what kind of entity is extension? (2) Is extension accidental or essential to material substance, using ‘accidental’ and ‘essential’ in this sense: is extension a feature that material substances can, at least by divine power, lack? I investigate these philosophers’ arguments in connection with two phenomena, one natural and the other supernatural: (i) condensation and rarefaction (C/R); and (ii) transubstantiation (T), the Catholic interpretation of the sacrament of the Eucharist.
First, on the Aristotelian understanding of C/R, when a body condenses or rarefies, only its extension changes while everything else (prime matter, substantial form, and qualities) stays the same. Thus, C/R was considered a good test case for examining the ontological status of quantity and its relation to material substance. Second, according to T, when the priest blesses the host, the body of Christ takes the place of the bread and comes to be really present on the altar. Yet the accidents of the bread, including its extension, remain without inhering in the substance of the bread. As a result, T has far-reaching implications for the metaphysics of bodies and their accidents…
Ockham, Buridan, and Oresme hold three different positions on the ontological status of quantity. Yet because of their commitment to T, they agree that a material substance can exist without extension, at least by divine power; so, extension is an accidental feature of material substances. This view is the target of severe attack by early modern thinkers, such as Descartes [who was a Romanist], for whom material substance is essentially extended. Yet my study reveals some interesting and often overlooked deeper continuities between Descartes’ metaphysics and late medieval thinkers, such as Ockham’s mechanistic theory of C/R and Oresme’s view of accidents as modes of substance.”
.
On Mechanics & Physics
Article
Wallace, William A. – ‘Mechanics from Bradwardine to Galileo’ Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 32, no. 1 (Jan-Mar, 1971), pp. 15-28
.
Books
On the Middle Ages
Grant, Edward – Physical Science in the Middle Ages (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1977) 140 pp. ToC
Cross, Richard – The Physics of Duns Scotus (Clarendon Press, 1998) 315 pp. ToC
On an Individual
Thomas of Bradwardine, his Tractatus de Proportionibus: its Significance for the Development of Mathematical Physics ed. & trans. H. Lamar Crosby Jr. (Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1961) ToC
This includes an English translation of Bradwardine’s Tractatus with an introduction.
.
On Truth
Novaes, Catarina Dutilh – ‘Lessons on Truth from Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox’ The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), vol. 61, no. 242 (Jan. 2011), pp. 58-78
.
On Beauty
Ching, Kenneth K. – ‘Beauty & Ugliness in Offer & Acceptance’ 60 Wayne Law Review 469 (2014) 24 pp.
“This essay applies classical aesthetics to the contract doctrine of offer and acceptance. It argues that contract law can be understood, analyzed, and improved using three criteria of beauty: proportion, integrity, and clarity. Based on these criteria, this essay (1) argues that the traditional doctrine of offer and acceptance is beautiful, (2) argues that UCC [Uniform Commercial Code] §2-207 is ugly and fails to improve upon offer and acceptance, and (3) suggests improvements for UCC §2-207.”
.
Historical
Aristotle through the Middle Ages
Bradshaw, David – Aristotle East & West: Metaphysics & the Division of Christendom Pre Buy (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004)
“This book traces the development [of] thought about God and the relationship between God’s being and activity from Aristotle, through the pagan Neoplatonists, to thinkers such as Augustine, Boethius, and Aquinas (in the West) and Dionysius the Areopagite, Maximus the Confessor, and Gregory Palamas (in the East). The result is a comparative history of philosophical thought in the two halves of Christendom, providing a philosophical backdrop to the schism between the Eastern and Western churches.”
.
On Lutheranism
Haga, Joar – Was there a Lutheran Metaphysics?: The Interpretation of Communicatio Idiomatum in Early Modern Lutheranism Pre (V&R, 2012) 295 pp. ToC
.
Latin Articles
Ames, William – A Theological Disputation Against Metaphysics (Leiden, 1632) 18 pp. 19 theses
Ames (who was a Ramist) himself used metaphysical categories and distinctions. This work is a broadside against the abuse and subtleties of metaphysics. He frequently counters the Romanist Suarez’s metaphysical teachings.
Geiger, Hans Rudolf – Miscellaneous Physical-Metaphysical Questions (Zurich, 1654)
Geiger (d. 1662) was a reformed professor of physics at Zurich.
Lavater, Johann – A Philosophical Dissertatiom on Metaphysics, its Nature, the Distinction of it from other Discipines, its Necessity & its Utility (Zurich, 1677) 39 pp.
Lavater (1624-1695) was a reformed professor of rhetoric and philosophy at Zurich.
.
.
Latin Books
Order of Authors
Early & Medieval Church
John of Damascus
Bradwardine
1500’s
Goclenius
Riolan
1600’s
Alsted
Keckermann
Baron
Combach
Jacchaeus
Revius
Burgersdijck
Maccovius
Rutherford
Heereboord
Greydanus
Grebenitz
.
Early & Medieval Church
Early Church
John of Damascus – Philosophical Chapters
.
1300’s
Bradwardine, Thomas – Of the Cause of God, Against the Pelagians, & on the Power of Causes, to those of Merton [College in Oxford], in 3 Books… (London, 1618) ToC
Bradwardine (c.1290-1349) was an English clerical scholar and theologian, known as Doctor Profundus. He was a favorite of Rutherford. For an English survey of this book, see the section by Heiko A. Oberman, ‘Thomas Bradwardine: The Cause of God Against the Pelagians’ in Forerunners of the Reformation… (1966), and the book by Gordon Leff, Bradwardine & the Pelagians in Cambrdge Studies in Medieval Life & Thought, New Series, vol. 5 (rep. 2008; Cambridge, 1957).
“…famous… for his… vigorous attack on what he perceived as a revival of Pelagianism in Ockham’s thought regarding divine foreknowledge and future contingents… Bradwardine became interested in formal theology when investigating Ockham’s account of how God knows created actions as contingencies. His De causa Dei is a compendious refutation of every imaginable species of reasoning that denies God certain, necessary knowledge of all created action, representing the high watermark of Augustinian determinism in pre-Reformation western theology.” – Stephen E. Lahey
.
Table of Contents
Prefatory Epistle
Book 1
Ch. 1, First is premitted two suppositions, the first of which is that God is the highest perfection and the highest good, so that nothing else is able to be more perfect or better. The second is, Nothing infinite has proceeded into entities, but is in whatever genus, the first one. 1
Corollaries
1. It has a moral corollary containing 40 parts, contra 40 errors, of which the first is against the Protogorean doubt that God is. 3
2. Contra Diagorus and those who foolishly deny that God is 3
3. Contra the those who doubt or deny that God really, equivelently or supereminently has all virtue… 3
4. Contra those who deny that God is simply of all infinite virtue and goodness whatsoever 4
5. Contra those who say that God is not fully sufficient of Himself, but is otherwise in need 4
6. Contra those who believe that God is not necessary, but is only contingently the highest perfection, and is Himself newly mutable, irascible, placable, distressable, able to be made glad or passible, and whatever other passion; and those of the opinion also that God is an accidental name and is not essentially simple 4
7. Contra those who deny that God is actively omnipotent and passively of no potency, that is, He is not able to be acted upon by any other creature whatsoever 5
8. Contra those of the opinion that God is not a rational substance and power actually having an intellect, a free, knowing will, and a willing; and those also who think that the divine will is not universally efficacious, that is, is not impedable, not frustratable and not defectable in any way 5
9. Contra those who believe that God is ignorant of anything 6
10. Contra those who construct God out of human members, other things or whatever other diverse things conjoined together, and against those who deny Himself to be a most simple substance, indivisible, without having composition, partability or size, namely, a body. 7
11. Contra the Zabians & the wise of them which worship the heavens for God 8
12. Contra the worshippers of the sun or the moon, Mars or Jupiter, whatever heavenly signs, or of any signs, or whatever parts of the heavens altogether 8
13. Contra those who fabricate to themselves temporal gods: men, animals, trees, fire or whatever such thing 8
14. Against those vain and trifling persons who worship that onerous multitude of equal gods, of the same species or nature 10
15. Against those who fabricate many equal gods, differing in species or nature 11
16. Against those who lay down the confusion of many gods of unequal power and disparate dignity, or of the same species or diversity 12
17. Against those who deny that God is one and not many, affirming it to be possible that there be many, and against those who deny that it be simply necessary that there be one and not many, affirming that it be possible that there be many 12
18. Against those who set down many first principles simply contrary to each other, of which none is reducible to another, nor everyone to any, one thing being common to them, whether good or evil; and consequently, further, against those who dream up two gods, or many, of the same variety 13
19. Against the deceiving poets that cause prejudice against God by human studies and other things 14
20. Against those who fabricate dishonest and foul gods eating and drinking, commingling with women or in dishonest or foul things or games, or dramatic pleasures 14
21. Contra idolaters 15
22. Contra the Arians 19
23. Contra the Donatists 19
24. Contra the Sabellians 19
25. Contra those who do not distinguish, but withdraw from God being simply of infinite virtue and infinite power, even intensively 19
26. … 20
…
33. Contra the philosophers that deny the possibility of creation, annihilation and recreation 65
34. Contra the philosophers that deny the possibility of the creation of the world 66
35. Contra the philosophers and heretics which deny the possibility of the conception and birth of the Virgin, and say that Christ never born of the holy, always virgin, Mary
… 72
40. … 119
Ch. 2, That God is the necessary conserver of all other things 146
1. That nothing created is sufficient to conserve another thing
2. That it is necessary that God of Himself and immediately saves whichever creature He pleases
3. That it is necessary that God save whichever creature He pleases immediately by whatever created cause
Ch. 3, That God is the necessary efficient cause of whatever a thing does
1. That no thing is able to do anything apart from God
2. That no thing is able to do anything except God per se and immediately does that same thing
3. That no thing is able to do anything except that God immediately does that same thing in which another works
Ch. 4, That any moving creature, God necessarily comoves
1. That nothing whatever is able to move except by God, of Himself and properly, comoving the same
2. That nothing whatever is able to move except by God immediately moving the same
3. That nothing whatever is able to move except by God immediately moving the same by some other mover
4. That no principle is provided that any creature, with respect to any created cause, is caused simply immediately
Ch. 5, That God is not mutable in any way
1. That God essentially and by presence is necessarily everywhere, much more in the world and in all its parts
2. Whether, further, He is outside the world in a place, or in an imaginary, infinite, void?
3. Hence, immense and uncircumscribed He is able truly to be called
4. Hence a response is seen to be manifest to the old questions of the gentiles and heretics, ‘Where is your God?’ and ‘Where was God before the world?’
5. Hence, similarly it is clearly manifest that there is able to be a void from a body, but by no means is there able to be a void from God
Ch. 6, That God has a distinct knowledge [scientia] of all things
1. That God has a distinct knowledge [scientia] even of all present, past and future things; indeed, and of possibilities and impossibilities, imaginables and cognizables in every way; and hence is truly able to be called all-knowing, as also omnipotent
Ch. 7, Objects agianst the 6th and solves.
Ch. 8, That God has a common and special will and love to everything
Ch. 9, That the divine will is the efficient cause of whatever thing has been made
Ch. 10, That the divine will is universally effectual, insuperable and necessary in causation; it is not imedable, nor frustratable in any way
1. That for God to will to do or for anything to be done through itself or through any other in whichever way, it necessarily follows that it is done in that way; nor in our way is it to be sought, it setting aside other forces…
Ch. 11, That the first, necessary and truly incomplex principle is God; and that the first complex principle is simply of God: God is posited, God knows all, God wills all, or something similar.
Ch. 12, Displays which kind that first principle is, due to the affirmation, God is that which He is, or, God is God.
Ch. 13, From these things a 12 part corollary is inferred:
1. That act is simply before power
2. That being is simply more prior than non-being
3. That is necessarily first by the possibility of contradiction
4. That is necessarily first by the impossibility [of it]
5.
6.
7. That which is necessary is in no way rightly defined through possibility or impossibility
8. That necessary being is simply not able to be defined [or limited]
9.
10. That the first cause of whatever true negation is in God
11. That God is the first cause of all non-being
12. That the first cause of whatever impossibility and repugnance is in God
Ch. 14, That the divine will is the cause of whatever is future and whatever is past; why it is such.
1.
Ch. 15, That things known [scitae] are not the causes of the divine knowledge [scientiae]
Ch. 16, Contra those that say known things are a cause sine qua non [without which nothing] of the divine knowledge, but not the cause.
Ch. 17
Ch. 18
Ch. 19, Objects & responds
Ch. 20,
Ch. 21,
Ch. 22,
Ch. 23,
Ch. 24, Objects against the immutability of the divine knowledge [scientia] & responds
Ch. 25, Objects against the immutability of the divine will & looses
Ch. 26,
Ch. 27, That everything comes about by the divine providence
Ch. 28, Of Fate
Ch. 29. Of chance & fortune
Ch. 30, That voluntary things are governed by the laws of divine providence
Ch. 31, That voluntary actions suppose the divine providence
Ch. 32,
Ch. 33
Ch. 34, If and in what way God wills and does not will sin
Ch. 35
Ch. 36
Ch. 37
Ch. 38
Ch. 39
Ch. 40
Ch. 41
Ch. 42
Ch. 43,
Ch. 44,
Ch. 45,
Ch. 46,
Ch. 47, Objects & responds
Book 2
Ch. 1, That free choice is, and what it is
Ch. 2, Of the act of free choice and its object
1.
Ch. 3, That no inferior cause is able to necessitate the created will to a reason and its free act unto proper merit, or sin.
1.
Ch. 4,
Ch. 5,
Ch. 6, That that special help of God is his invincible will
Ch. 7,
Ch. 8, On what is perseverance…
1.
Ch. 9, That neither man nor angel before the fall, by any grace, was able to persevere finally, or for the time, without the further special help of God
Ch. 10, Objects & responds
Ch. 11, That perseverance is not some created gift of God really different and distinct from charity and grace
1.
Ch. 12, Objects & responds
Ch. 13, That that help without which none may persevere, and through which any perseveres, is the Holy Spirit, by the divine goodness and will
Ch. 14, That perseverance in grace is given from God, and is not matched by merits
Ch. 15,
Ch. 16, Of eternal perseverance, or the obstinacy of evil-doers in evil, and its cause
Ch. 17,
Ch. 18, Against some who say that an act of free choice is nothing
Ch. 19, Objects & responds
Ch. 20, That any act of the created will, God is the necessary co-effector
1.
Ch. 21, Rehearses six false responses, the first of which says that…
Ch. 22 Specially corrects the first of these
Ch. 23, the Second
Ch. 24, the Third
Ch. 25, the Fourth
Ch. 26, the Fifth
Ch. 27, the Sixth
Ch. 28, Objects against the 20th and responds
Ch. 29, That the uncreated and created will, in co-effecting a voluntary act are not coequal, nor coequal in the order of nature
Ch. 30, That in every common action of uncreated and created wills, the uncreated naturally antecedes the created
Ch. 31, Objects & responds
1. That sacred theology requires a pious and prudent reader
Ch. 32,
Ch. 33, Objects & responds
1.
Ch. 34, Per what has been premised, it draws men to fear and love, to confidence, to patience and humility, to prayer and refers to graces
Book 3
Ch. 1
Ch. 2,
Ch. 3, On contingency unto whichever, according to diverse opinions, and that it is itself
Ch. 4, What contingency to whichever is
1. What liberty of contradiction is, and which is the free act in the liberty of contradiction
Ch. 5, Infers as a corollary 13 parts out of the premises:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. That contingency unto whichever and necessity are not repugnant
7. That contingency is properly said in respect of presence
8. That liberty is properly said in respect of presence
9.
10.
11. That only the act of the divine will ad extra is simply contingent equally
12. That only the act of the divine will ad extra is simply free in the liberty of contradiction
13.
Ch. 6, Objects & responds
Ch. 7, Moves the question, Is there not something in the power of the created will?; and it supplies one response and correction
Ch. 8, Rehearses and emends 6 other short responses
Ch. 9, Responds
Ch. 10, Distinguishes between necessity and liberty
1.
Ch. 11, Objects and responds
1.
Ch. 12
Ch. 13, Treats the opinion of Cicero, saying that God does not know the future
Ch. 14, Treats the opinion saying that many things are future in their nature, but not before God
Ch. 15, Rehearses 4 opinions of sophists saying that nothing is future
Ch. 16, Refells 5 opinions of the Megarians denying all power to the future
Ch. 17, Corrects six opinions which adjudge that something is future unto whichever, or not future in a composite (not a divided) sense
Ch. 18, Rectifies 7 opinions saying that something is able to begin to be future
Ch. 19
Ch. 20
Ch. 21
Ch. 22
Ch. 23
Ch. 24
Ch. 25
Ch. 26
Ch. 27
Ch. 28, Rehearses one erroneous, authoritative gloss
Ch. 29, Objects and responds
Ch. 30
Ch. 31, Revokes the same through the way of the necessity and contingency of the intellect and of the divine knowledge
Ch. 32, Reduces the same through the way of the immutability of the divine will
Ch. 33, Moves the same through the way of revelation in the Word, and sets down 6 responses conceding the revelation in the Word, and argues gravely against them
Ch. 34, Argues especially against the first
Ch. 35, Against the second
Ch. 36, Against the third
Ch. 37, Against the fourth
Ch. 38, Against the fifth
Ch. 39, Against the sixth
Ch. 40, Seizes those denying the revelation in the Word
Ch. 41, Rehearses diverse ways according to diverse viewings in the Word, and objects and solves
Ch. 42,
Ch. 43, Treats another response
Ch. 44, Rehearses a third response
Ch. 45, Ventilates a fourth response
Ch. 46, Against the same opinion and hypothesis through the way of revelation in the proper kind of pure creatures, namely angels
Ch. 47, Against the same opinion and hypothesis through the same way, respecting pure humans
Ch. 48, Rehearses and corrects 4 responses
Ch. 49, Rehearses the twofold opinion saying that in future revelations the necessity is ordained or absolute; in others, however, it is nothing.
Ch. 50, Responds to the opinion of philosophers and theologians that God wills and knows [scit] necessarily. [Rather] Whatever He wills and knows follows the necessity of immutability, immobility, stability, and has not been ordained previously and in an absolute way simply, not of [his] nature, nor violently or unwillingly, nor contrarily, but consentingly with respect to the highest and maximum liberty
1.
Ch. 51, Of eternity
1.
Ch. 52,
Ch. 53,
.
1500’s
Goclenius, Rudolf – An Introduction to the First Philosophy of the Peripatetics & Scholastics, which is Accustomed to be Called Metaphysics; Some Disputations of this Kind are Appended (Frankfurt, 1598) 223 pp.
Goclenius (1547-1628) was a reformed professor of philosophy at Marburg.
Riolan, Sr., Jean – Short Metaphysical Works (Paris: 1598) 39 pp. ToC
Riolan (1538-1605) was reformed.
.
1600’s
Alsted, Johann Heinrich
General
A Most Concise Delineation of Metaphysics, Simultaneously Publicly Proposed to be Disputed Again… (Herborne, 1611) 18 chs. 68 pp.
Table of Contents
Introduction: the System of Metaphysics will be Given; we will fore-notify the titles and offices of it. The significant titles of it are nine. 5
There are three offices of metaphysics 7
1. On the Nature of Metaphysics 9
2. On Essence & Existence 13
3. Of Unity 18
4. Of Truth 22
5. Of Goodness 24
6. Of Sameness & Diversity 27
7. Of the Whole & a Part 31
8. Of Simplicity & Compositeness 36
9. Of being Perfect & Imperfectness 38
10. Of Naturalness & Artificiality 40
11. Of Finiteness & Infiniteness 41
12. Of Necessity & Contingency 42
13. Of Uncreated & Created, & Synonymous Divisions 46
14. Of Illocalness & Localness 49
15. On Act & Potential 50
16. On Possibility & Impossibility 54
17. On Cause & Causation 56
18. On Substance & Accident 62
Metaphysics Drawn out in Three Books through Methodical Precepts, Select Theorems & Clear, Short Commentaries… (Herborne, 1613) 283 pp. This is the same as his Most Exquisite Method of Metaphysics… (1611) ToC
Table of Contents
To the Candid Reader 3
Metaphysical Precognitions 9
Bk. 1, Of Transcendentals 27
1. Of Being 27
2. Of the Synonymous Attributes of Being, which are Something & a Thing 34
3. Of Essence 41
4. Of Existence 46
5. Of Duration 54
6. Of Unity 58
7. On Truth 78
8. Of Goodness 92
9. Of Order 108
10. Of Number 111
11. Of Perfection 113
12. Of Beauty 115
13. Of Act & Potential 117
14. Of Simplicity & Composition 134
15. Of Being per se & in accidents 139
16. Of Universality & Singularity 142
17. Of a Whole & a Part 148
18. Of Priority, Connection & Posteriority 155
19. Of Infinity & Finiteness 160
20. Of Absoluteness & Respectiveness 164
21. Of Reality & Intentionality 166
22. Of Abstraction & Concretion 171
23. Of Measure & a thing having been Measured 176
24. Of Subject & Adjunct 180
25. Of a Sign & Signifying 184
26. Of Beginning & having Begun 188
27. Of Cause & Causation 192
28. Of Necessity & Contingency 222
29. Of Identity, Diversity & Distinction 232
Bk. 2, Of Predications 248
1. The Number & Utility of Predications 248
2. Of Substance 253
3. Of Quantity 255
4. Of Quality 257
5. Of Relation 258
6. Of Action 263
7. Of Passion 265
8. Of Four Predications Less Principal: Where, When, Situation, Habitus 266
Bk. 3, On Non-Being 269
A Metaphysical Conclusion 275
3 Tables Dividing Metaphysics 276
Appendix on the Nature, Constitution & Special Use of Metaphysics, Comprehending Some Theorems 279
Bk. 11 of the Encyclopedia, Propounding Metaphysics, in Two Distinct Parts in The Encyclopedia in Seven Distinct Tomes… (Herborne, 1630), pp. 573-630
Table of Contents
1. On Being 573
2. On Essence 576
3. On Existence 577
4. On Duration 578
5. On the Affections [Mode, Attributes & Passions] of Being in General 579
6. On Unity 580
7. On Truth 582
8. On Goodness 585
9. On Number 586
10. On Order 587
11. On Perfection 587
12. On Beauty 588
13. On Being per se & in Accidents 589
14. On Universal Being & Singular Being 590
15. On Being Act & Potential 591
16. On Independence & Dependence 594
17. On Not-Having-Been-Created & Having-Been-Created 595
18. On Being from Itself & from Another 596
19. On Absoluteness & Respectiveness 596
20. On Incorruptibility & Corruptibility 597
21. On Being, Complete & Incomplete 597
22. On Naturalness & Unnaturalness 598
23. On Simplicity & Compositeness 598
24. On a Whole & a Part 600
25. On Priorness, Connection & Posteriority 602
26. On Sameness & Diversity 603
27. On Illocality & Locality 606
28. On Permanence & Successiveness 606
29. On Measure & a thing having been Measured 607
30. On Possibility & Impossibility 607
31. On Infiniteness & Finiteness 608
32. On Being, Real & Rational 609
33. On Abstractness & Concreteness 610
34. On Beginning [Principio] & that Begun 611
35. On Cause in General 611
36. On the Efficient Cause 612
37. On the End 613
38. On Matter 614
39. On Form 614
40. On Causation 615
41. On Necessity & Non-Necessity 615
42. On a Subject & Adjunct 617
43. On Sign & Signifying 618
44. On Communicability & Incommunibility 619
Table of Part 1 620
Part 2, On Predications 620
1. On Predications in General 620
2. On Substance 621
3. On Quantity 622
4. On Quality 624
5. On Relation 625
6. On Action 627
7. On Passion 628
8. When, Where, Situation, Habitus 629
Table of Part 2 629
Keckermann, Bartholomaus – A Compendious System of the Science [Scientia] of Metaphysics, Furnished in Public Lectures in the Danzig Gymnasium, Distributed in Two Parts (Hanau, 1609) 112 pp. ToC This appears to be the same as the 1615 edition.
Table of Contents
Bk. 1, On Substance 17
1. Metaphysics in General, in which is Precognitions 17
2. Principles of Substance 22
3. Unity, Truth & Goodness 29
4. Perfection & Beauty 36
5. Order of Priority & Posteriority 38
6. The Order of Things which Simultaneously Are 43
7. Order of Universality & Singularity 45
8. Order of Dependence 52
9. Possibility, Necessity, Contingency, Facility & Difficulty 66
10. Duration, Extension & Place 73
11. Measure & that Having Been Measured 73
12. Order of Cognation & of Union 75
13. Order of Diversity 81
14. Relation 84
15. Division of Substance 92
Bk. 2 98
1. Nature of an Accident 98
2. The Division of an Accident 100
3. Being having been Clasped 103
4. Cognate-ness, or the Image of Being 104
5. The Opposite of Being, or Non-Being 108
Baron, Robert
Baron (1596–1639) was one of the Scottish Aberdeen doctors who had been a teacher of philosophy at the University of St. Andrews.
Note that ch. 1 is on Being & Essence. Numerous of the other chapters contain philosophical themes as well.
.
Table of Contents
Exercitation 1, On Being & Essence 1
1. The 1st Division of Real Being: it is displayed that God alone is a necessary being 1
2. The 2nd Division of Real Being: it is proved that God alone is being through essence [his being is identical to his essencel] 3
3. The 3rd Division of Real Being: it is explicated in what way God is pure act 8
4. The 4th Division of Real Being, which is sought from the modes of existence 12
5. The explication of these terms: being, essence, existence, subsistance, suppositum & person 20
6. Whether in creatures the suppositum and the singular nature of it differ in the thing 28
7. What is the cause why in created substances composition from essence and existence, and likewise from essence and subsistance, are yet not attributed to God in philosophy 34
8. Whether this having been posited, that every perfection is of the essence of God, it follows that personal subsistence is of his essence; and whether God, insofar as that is communicable to the three persons of the Trinity, may be a person, as Cajetan states. 41
9. Whether God is so common to three persons that He may be a single substance; and whether the three persons of the Trinity are three singular substances 47
10. Whether Christ, insofar as man, is a person; likewise, whether Christ, insofar as man, is everywhere 51
11. Whether the arguments of the Ubiquitarians sought from the personal union are valid 56
12. Whether the personal subsistence may be communicated to his human nature; and whether they rightly speak, who say that the humanity of Christ subsists everywhere through the subsistence; likewise that it exists everywhere according to his personal being. 64
Exercitation 2, On the Origin of the Soul & the Propagation of Sin 77
1. Of the Diversity of Material & Immaterial Forms 77
2. On the Double Causality & Power of Matter; further, on the Stretching forth of Forms out of the Power of Matter 82
3. Whether the Rational Soul is from being Handed Down [traduce] 88
4. Whether & in what way a Man is Truly Said to Beget a Man 95
5. Whether Generation has been Posited in the Production of Form, or Rather in the Conjunction of Form with Matter 101
6. Whether the Preceding Doctrine may Support the Propagation of Original Sin 109
7. Arguments are Solved which are Customarily Brought Against the Preceding Doctrine of the Propagation of Native Corruption through the Seed of the Parents 114
8. Some Questions are Propounded & Solved on the Propagation of Original Sin 121
9. Lighter Arguments are Dissolved which are Customarily Brought Against Creationism & the Infusion of the Soul 125
10. Whether anything better explains or expedites an account of the handing down of concupiscence, or the propension to evil, than what we say is the third explanation of Original Sin 128
11. Two other judgments on the handing down of sin are considered 136
12. The many dissensions among themselves which impugn the creation of souls are displayed, and three of the chief judgments of them on the origin of the soul are confuted 143
13. A fourth judgment is refelled, that of Balthasar Meisner 147
14. A fifth judgment is confuted, that of Timothy Bright of Cambridge 155
15. All of the judgments of traducianism have already been confuted; further, no one out of this number is able to better maintain or more easily explain the propagation of sin than we who defend the creation of souls 162
Exercitation 3, On Faith, Knowledge [Scientia] & Opinion 173
1. On the Firmness, Certainty & Evidence relating to the Consent of our Mind 173
2. In what way to know, to believe and to have an opinion may differ between themselves 178
3. Whether faith may always be 183
4. Whether faith may be able simultaneously to be with knowledge [scientia] respecting the same proposition, in the same intellect 188
5. Of the division of faith into explicit and implicit; and whether the lack of evidence that we give to faith makes anything for the blind and implicit faith of the papists 194
6. Of the Triple Light, namely, of Nature, of Faith of Grace, and of Glory 198
7. Whether there may be given to pilgrims [viatoribus] some light more clear than the light of faith 204
8. Three Questions are Solved 209
9. The judgment of Nicholas Grevinchovin is refelled, who says that the principle [habitum] of faith is not infused, but acquired 215
10. Whether faith, whether acutal or in principle [habitualis], may be, or is able to be, in infants 219
11. Whether Faith may be in Demons? 230
12. Whether in the Soul of Christ there was Faith? Whether it may be in the Saints which have already been Translated to Heaven, they having the Face-to-Face Knowledge of God, as the Scholastics Speak 235
13. Whether the Remonstrants Rightly Deny that Adam Before the Fall had Power to Believe in Christ 240
14. Whether the Object of Faith is able to be False 249
15. In what way may be Solved that Argument of the Remonstrants that, ‘Whatever everyone is required to believe, that is true. [But even all reprobates are required to believe that Christ died for them. Therefore it is true that Christ for them.]” [Baron was a hypothetical universalist.] 253
16. Whether Faith may be a Discursive Assent? and whether the Papists use Circular Reasoning in establishing the faith? 262
[Their circular syllogism is: “That which is able to be known by sola Scriptura, by that order of knowing, is not more known, but is more unknown by Scripture itself. But the Church and its infallibility is able to be known by sola Scriptura. Therefore, etc.]
17. Whether knowledge [notitia] may be an elicited act from the principle [habitu] of faith? 273
18. Whether trust [fiducia] may be an act of faith? 276
19. Whether trust is an intellectual act, and in what way it differs from assent? 284
20. Whether the object of saving faith may be the remission of sins already accomplished [impetrata]? or, on the other hand, whether it may be the remission of sins to be accomplished and to be obtained? Where, in the way, is solved the chief arguments of Bellarmine against the object and nature of justifying faith. 291
21. Whether and how far faith pertains to the will 296
22. Whether love [charitas] may be the form of faith 300
23. Whether religion may be a theological virtue distinct from faith 304
24. The theology of pilgrims [viatorum], in three ways taken, is displayed; and the theology in the first way accepted is proved not to be a habit from faith, distinguished in the thing. 310
25. The second way accepted is proved, contra the theologian Anthony Ruvius, not to be knowledge [scientiam], but a divine trust 317
26. Theology the third way accepted, that is, scholastic theology, is proved to be an accumulated habit from faith and philosophical disciplines 320
27. That theology is similar to all the Aristotelian habits, especially, indeed, to prudence 324
28. Whether theology is a speculative discipline, or practical? 327
29. Whether the theology of pilgrims is able to be called speculative, from speculation [viewing] or vision, by which the future is in the Father 332
30. Whether theology, truly and properly so-called, is able to be in an impious man, or the unregenerate 334
General Metaphysics… All Accommodated to the Use of Theology… (d. 1639; London, 1658) 479 pp. ToC 1, 2 Outline Indices: Scripture & Authors
Table of Contents
Part 1
1. On Disciplines in General & in Specific on Metaphysics 1
Pt. 2, The Definition of Metaphysics & its Explanation 5
2. Whether Being as Being may have Truly & Properly Called Properties, & Likewise, True Principles through which those Properties are Demonstrated 8
3. In What Consists the Principle [Ratio] of Transcendental Unity & What are its Species 14
4. On Truth in Being, or on Truth according as it is an Affection of Being 28
5. On Transcendental Good, which is an Affection of Being 39
Disputation on Evil 49
6. On the Divisions of Being Broadly Accepted, into Being per se & Being per accidens, Being Negative & Positive, Real & Rational 67
7. On the Division of Being into Act & Power 76
Disputation on Act & Power 84
8. On the Efficient Cause 96
Disputation on the First Efficient Cause, & in Specific on its First Operation, namely Creation 107
Disputation on the Second Operation of the First Cause, namely Conservation 121
Disputation on the Third Operation of the First Cause, namely the Concursus of it with Second Causes 107
9. On the Material Cause of Substances & Accidents 169
A Disputation on the Prime Matter of Substance 188
10. Of the Formal Cause, Substantial & Accidental 202
Disputation 1, On the Origin of Forms, & in Specific, on the Origin of the Rational Soul 210
Disputation 2, On the Multitude of Forms in the Same Composite 255
Disputation 3, On the Generation of a Composite Substance 276
11. On the Final & Exemplary Cause 286
12. On Necessity & Contingency 291
Disputation 1, On the Liberty of Choice in Man 299
Disputation 2, On the Foreknowledge & Providence of God, & on the Concord of them with the Contingency of Things & the Liberty of Human Choice 340
13. On Sameness & Diversity 378
14. On Absoluteness & Respectiveness 390
15. On the Whole & Part 400
Part 2, The Special Part of Metaphysics
Section 1
Whether Being may be Univocally Predicated of its Species & how far Metaphysics may Descend to Consider Species of Being 419
Section 2
On the Division of Being into Created & Uncreated, & to whom it Adheres 427
Disputation 1, On Essence & Existence, & of the Composition of Creatures out of Being & Essence 427
Disputation 2, On the Composition of a Creature out of Existence & Subsistence 447
Disputation 3, On the Simplicity of Uncreated Being 459
Combach, Johann – The 3rd Edition of the Metaphysics, in Two Books, Comprehending the Universal Doctrine of First Philosophy by the Most Brief Theorems, Illustrated with Necessary Comments… (Frankfurt, 1630) ToC 628 pp.
Combach (1585-1651) was a professor of physics at Marburg.
Jacchaeus, Gilbert – Institutions of the First Philosophy, or of Metaphysics, in 6 Books (Leiden: Elsevir, 1640) 391 pp. ToC
Jacchaeus (c.1578-1628) was a reformed professor of philosophy at Herborn and Leiden.
Revius, Jacobus – Suarez Repurged, or a Syllabus of the Metaphysical Disputations of Francis Suarez, a Theologian of the Society of Jesus, with the Notes of Jacob Revius… (Leiden: 1644) 1,127 pp. Index
Revius (1586-1658) was a reformed, professor of philosophy at Leiden who was anti-Cartesian.
Table of Contents
Dedicatory Epistle
Introduction 1
1. On the Nature of First Philosophy, or of Metaphysics 5
1. The Object of Metaphysics 4
2. Texts 13-15 7
3. Whether Metaphysics is Only One Science 8
. Metaphysics is able to be Defined 9
4. How many are the offices of this science, what are its ends, its utility; where is of its causes. 12
5. Whether metaphysics is perfectly a speculative science, or rather a wisdom 13
6. Whether out of all the sciences, metaphysics is the most grasped for by man by the natural appetite 18
2. Of the Essential Reason or Concept of Being 21
3. Of the passions of being in common, & its principles 38
4. Of transcendental unity in common 48
5. Of individual unity & its principle 67
6. Of formal & universal unity 75
7. Of general varieties of distinctions 98
8. Of verity, or truth, that it is a passion of being 109
9. Of falsity, or an untruth 123
10. Of good, or of transendental goodness 129
11. Of Evil 140
1. Whether evil may be something in things, & how many kinds there may be? 140
2. How many kinds of evil may there be? 143
3. Where & from where may evil be, or what causes it may have? 147
. What is the end of evil? 148
. What is the subjective cause of evil? 150
. Whether a formal cause may be given to evil? 150
. As far as the efficient [cause] of evil 151
. In what way evil may be from the First Cause 154
4. Why evil is not numbered among the attributes of being 155
12. Of the cause of being in common 156
13. Of the material cause of substance 170
14. Of the material cause of accidents 195
15. Of the formal substantial cause 204
16. Of the formal accidental cause 230
17. Of the efficient cause in common 235
18. Of the proximate efficient cause 242
19. Of causes, necessary & free, or of contingent agents, where is of even fate, fortune & chance 262
20. Of the first efficient cause & its first action, which is creation 317
21. Of the first efficient cause, & its other action, which is conservation 339
22. Of the first cause, & another of its actions, which is cooperation, or concursus with secondary causes 345
23. Of the final cause in common 428
…
Burgersdijck, Franco – Institutions of Metaphysics in Two Books… last ed., largely emended (Hague, 1657) ToC
Burgersdijck (1590-1635) was a Dutch, reformed logician and professor of moral and natural philosophy. He was also earlier a professor of philosophy at the French University of Saumur.
Table of Contents
To the Benevolent Reader by Heereboord
Eulogy by Peter Cuae
Bk. 1 1
1. On the Nature of Metaphysics 1
2. On the Common Account of Being 10
3. On that which is a Medium Between Being & Nothing, in General 20
4. On Privation & an External Denomination 25
5. On Rational Being 30
6. On Relation 34
7. On the Modes of Beings 44
8. On Uncircumscribed Principles, or on Essence & Existence 49
9. On Circumscribed Principles of Metaphysics 57
10. On the Affections of Being in General 59
11. On Unity & Multiplicity in General 61
12. On Numerical & Formal Unity, & on the Principle of Individuation 66
13. On Universal Unity 75
14. On Species & Grades of Unity 82
15. On Diversity or Distinction, & Convenience 87
16. On Opposition 95
17. On Order 100
18. On Truth & Falsity 104
19. On the Adjuncts of Truth 114
20. On Good & Evil 117
21. On Locality, Temporality & Duration 128
22. On a Whole & Part 139
23. On Cause & Causation in General 145
24. On Material Cause 151
25. On Formal Cause 158
26. On Efficient Cause 167
27. On the End 181
28. On Subject & Adjunct 193
29. On that which is Necessary, Impossible, Contingent & Possible 204
30. On Potency & Act 213
31. On being Perfect & Imperfect, or on Perfectability & Perfection 221
Bk. 2
1. On the Division of Being into Substance & Accidents; & on Substance in General 227
2. On Prime & Secondary Substances, & on Subsistence 232
3. On the Distribution of Being in God & the Creature, & other Equivalents 243
4. That God is 247
5. On the Divine Essence & its Attributes in General 255
6. On the Necessity, Unity & Eternity of God 260
7. On the Immensity, Simplicity & Immutability of God 266
8. On the Life & Intellect of God 276
9. On the Will & Power of God 290
10. On Creation & Conservation 296
11. On Concursus, or the Cooperation of God with Creatures 307
12. On Created Substances 317
13. On the Existence & the Nature of Angels 323
14. On the Attributes of Angels 328
15. On the Actions of Angels 333
16. On the Separated Human Soul 345
17. On Accidents 356
Maccovius, Johannes & Adrian Heereboord – Metaphysics Adorned & Applied for the Use of Questions in Philosophy & Theology, 3rd edition, Explicated, Vindicated & Refuting by Adrian Heereboord (Leiden, 1658) 293 pp. ToC
Table of Contents
Dedications & Epistle
Preface
ToC
Bk. 1
1. On the Nature of Metaphysics 1
2. On the Principles of External Being 5
3. On the Principles of Internal Being 7
4. On the Modes of Being in General 11
5. On Oneness 16
6. On the Subject 28
7. On the Truth 38
8. On the Good 51
9. On Necessity & Contingency 69
10. On Simplicity & Composition 81
11. On Measure & Something Measured 97
12. On Sign & that Signified 108
13. On Beginning & Having Begun, as well as the Efficient Cause 119
14. On the End 145
15. On Matter 154
16. On Form 164
17. On Priorness & Those Things which are Called Simultaneous 172
Bk. 2
1. On Substance 179
2. On Accidentalness in General, & in Specific on Quantity 198
3. On Quality 215
4. On Action 232
5. On Passion 244
6. On Relation 250
7. On Encompassed Being 270
8. On Cognate-ness & the Opposite of Being 282-98
Index of Theological Questions
Philosophical Index of Terms, Distinctions, Questions & Canons
Rutherford, Samuel – A Scholastic Disputation on Divine Providence (Edinburgh, 1649), Metaphysical Inquiries, that may Perhaps bring forth a Measure of Light to the Doctrine of Providence, pp. 531-620
A Detailed (but not Exhaustive) Outline
1 – Whether being is more simple than non-being? 531
This is the first principle: ‘All the same is the same’… 531
2 – Whether God is the lordly cause of being and non-being? 532
Being is prior to non-being 532
God maintains dominion in non-entities and non-futures 532
Argument 1: Genesis 1, ‘and God said’ 533
Argument 2 533
Argument 3 534
. Non-beings of themselves and out of their own nature are
. not in kind non-beings 535
Argument 4 535
. The reason of creating in which 536
Argument 5 536
Argument 6 537
Argument 7 537
3 – Whether God is the origin and cause of impossibilities and possibilities? 538
God is the cause of possibilities 538
Because God is omnipotent, therefore beings are possible; yet
. it is not the case that they are possible, and therefore God is
. able to create them 538
4 – But the other part of the question is more difficult, namely, Whether anything is impossible, except that it is originally impossible with God? It is responded that nothing is impossible as such. 540 6 points
God is the origin of impossibilities 540
Nothing is impossible simply or incomplexly, but only complexly
. or as it is incompaible is it impossible 540
A hircocervus [an animal, half-goat and half-stag] is able to be
. created by God, and not able to be created in a different
. respect 541
Therefore, that something is not able to be because God is not
. able to make it, is not contrary to: God is not able to make
. this, because this is not able to be 543
Impossibility in the first infinite being is the origin of all
. impossibility in creatures 544
5 – Whether from the hypothesis that there was no first cause, whether possiblity or impossibility would exist in the nature of things? 545
If the impious and execrable supposition be set up that there
. were no first cause, nothing would be possible, nothing
. impossible, and a chaotic contradiction would prevail 546
God, by his positive decree knows all non-futures 548
If God were not, nothing would be true or false, nor would there
. be being or non-being 549
God is the stimulus [actus] of whatever is able to be 550
If there were no first being, there would be no things not
. repugnant to each other, and that from eternity 550
If you suppose there not to be a first being, there would be no
. true, nor false proposition 553
Beings are possible in themselves without the consideration of
. a first being, but if you posit the first being not to be, then
. nothing will be impossible 553
[the page numbering skips from 553-56]
If there were not a prime being, this principle would be
. shattered: ‘It is impossible for the same thing to be and not
. to be simultaneously.’ 556
6 – Whether possibilities are something real [actual]? 557 I respond they are not, as they are called only a name merely extrinsically in relation [habitudine] to Omnipotency.
A possibel thing is not something real. 557
The essences of things are not from eternity. 557
What the future is 559
7 – By what knowledge and will God comprehends possibilities? 559
In what way God knows possibilities. 559
The practical and speculative knowledge [scientia] of God, in
. what way it differs from our knowledge [scientia]. 560
Double Possibilities 560
The twofold approving will of God. 560
How much God may necessarily love possibilities. 560
8 – Whether God exercises providence in all things by a necessity of nature or freely? 561
A hypothetical absolute necessity is able to be in God 561
The necessity of nature in God is twofold. 562
9 – Whether God’s free good pleasure is the cause of essences, of grades of essence and of specific forms in natural things, moral things, supernatural things, and artificial things? 563
What is in potential and what is in any act is by the same mode,
. according to the Scriptures. 563
An act is a prior power. 563
A thing materially creatable and a created thing are distinguished 564
God, having freely made that creature [man], materially took up
. a rational soul 565
It being necessary, we demonstrate the truth of the first thing
. spoken 565
By the same action of God to freely create, God created Adam,
. a human man, etc. 566
The most supreme liberty of the Supreme Worker proves that
. He freely creates a thing out of any agreeable essence
. 567
It is not necessary for God to create things of such an essence
. 567
The ideas of things have been formed in the mind of God
. according to his free good-pleasure, therefore so have the
. ideas of even the essence of things also 568
God is not able to command that men and angels believe God
. not to be, or to believe that contradictory things are
. simultaneously true 569
Subjection and non-subjection to the law may necessarily vary
. necessarily according to the rule of sin 572
Some things are good antecedently to the free good-pleasure
. of God according to a fittingness with God 572
God is not able to command except that it is good and the duty
. of the creature 574
God is not able to command you to do such things as are
. contradictory, out of his own consistency 574
10 – Whether the Creator may be able to require something injurious to the creature [No], and what sort of right does God have in his creatures? 577
‘Right’ is taken in a threefold way, and the sort of right God has
. in the creatures 577
We do not pay regard to syncretism with the Socinians 578
Someone having been created, this of itself founds a relation
. between the Creator and the creature, Lord and servant,
. and someone dependent with an obligation to obedience
. 579
Nor do those things set down for us an absolute necessity for a
. satisfaction being fulfilled by Christ 580 [Quotes Pareus]
The Socinians deny the immutability of the decrees of God 580
To what extent God is able to command his own hatred 582
. [quotes Sibrandus that God need not punish the sinner on
. account of his absolute dominion 583]
Sibrandus and we make the will of God the first rule of his
. righteousness [justice] to that which is outside of Himself
. 584
Beza on the question 584
To what extent justice belongs to God essentially, and what follows.
. 584
How far the justice of God is referred to his free will 584
How far and in what way the corrective justice of God, which is
. referred to the creatures, is not essentially in God 585
God out of grace, not out of justice gives the sponsor
. [Redeemer] 585
The means, how far they are means antecedently to the
. decrees of God 585
The Word of God notates the decree of God 586
Num. 31:16
What sort of law is before the decree 586
Whether the decree of God removes ability from a secondary cause?
. 586
The decree of God takes power [from creatures] by a mode not
. physical 586
Whether the absolute ability to act or not to act is of the essence of freedom? 587
The essence of a free creature is most wretchedly defined by
. Jesuits and Arminians 587
Whether the decree of God also blows [conspiret] in the same
. numeric act which the will elicits itself, if we set down that nothing
. is impossible in the decree of God? 588
I respond affirmatively, because the necessity of the decree and
. the necessity of the free exercise, these same remove the
. indifferent things of freedom.
A table 588
That the decree and created will flow together [conspiret] in the
. same point 588
11. Whether a free action is contingent? 589
By which pact a free act is contingent 589
12. Whether liberty is able to stand with an antecedent necessity? I respond affirmatively… 589
13. In what way, out of an antecedent, absolute necessity, is the consequence not absolutely necessary 589
14. By what sort of power may the good of the glory of God result out of sin 590 [On the part of a sinning creature, by a power merely obediential, not formal]
15. By what sort of knowledge does God look upon a conditional future? 590
18. Whether a creature is able to act without a concurrent primary cause? [I respond in the negative…] Whether God moves a secondary cause by a previous concurrence or a simultaneous one?
It is necessary that God premoves the secondary cause to act, and this contriving of two simultaneous, collateral and independent influences, of God and of the creatures, is impious 592
19-20. Concerning the insanity of the Jesuits in this matter. 592
21. A simultaneous influx of God and the creature everts the dependence of the creature in working by the Creator 594
22. A simultaneous influx of God and the creature brings in two first principles 594
24. These simultaneous influences evert the certain knowledge [scientia] of God 595
25. God does not establish that a secondary cause may work by simultaneous, standing influences 596
26. The influence of God in the second cause is not a permanent quality inhering in the second cause 596
Adam sinned freely though the influence of God was subtracted, without which he was not able not to fall 597
27. Whether or not the substraction in her [Eve] was the penalty of a sin preceding the sin? I respond in the negative.
28. In what way, therefore, had Adam the ability to will, if he willed to stand? I respond: in the greatest way, because he so retained his ability in relation to his free act…
Whether Adam sinned freely because he sinned by the remote predeterminate motion of God? 597
Whether there is such a thing as a contingent future and what it is? from an anonymous debater. 597
The necessity from the decree does not attach to the thing of the decree per se and always 597
The adversaries deny every future thing as they deny the future cause to be the decree of God, or another cause to hold than the cause of the present action 598
The Disputer objects: If a thing is from eternity, it has no cause, for no thing is from eternity except God; and if things were future from eternity, then they were not from eternity… 599
I respond, the Disputer supposes our opinion to be that the futurity of things from eternity is a real being, and that it was created from eternity or is coeternal with God, which we by no means teach…
The future is not a mere nothing. 599
The Disputer denies the future, because he does not know what the future is. 599
The Disputer affirms the future to be present and not future. 600
The Disputer objects: If God has decreed that tomorrow there will be rain, that tomorrow it will rain depends consequently on the decree of God; but a necessity of the consequence in no way depends on the decree of God, even as God is not otherwise able to decree; indeed, He is not able to decree so that what He decree is not, for progress would then be in infinity… 600
The sickly Disputer bears off every necessity of things which arises in the decree from God 601
The Disputer exchanges the cause of the present action for the future cause. 601
30. What truly is the future? 602 I respond it is an ideal and objective thing in the will and decree of God which finally in its time it will be a present act.
31. Is it not absurd to say that the futurity of sin was in God from eternity, or that the futurity of the sin against the Holy Spirit is in God? So the Disputer. I respond, but I have made good that the futurity of all sins is in the decree of God permissively from eternity. 602
32. Whether ordinability to the good comes through [conveniat,or is in accord with] sin per se, or yet by accident… I respond: This is not able to be conceded to the judgment of the Arminian… 604
In what way God in time and from eternity ordains sin. 604
33. Whether the Will of Sign is improperly and metonymically the will of God? [Yes; Rutherford explains that the Approving will that lies behind it in God is properly called his will, though the communication directing that to the creature, by creaturely signs and commands, is not properly God’s will as God has not willed it to be in the event.] 605
How far the will of sign may be a will?
I respond: The will of sign, according as it designates what is the pleasing and acceptable revealed will of God to us, that which is of our duty, so it is called the approving will, contradistinguished from the will of good-pleasure [of decree], and refers to two things:
1. To that which we ought to believe or do, inasmuch as that is obliging of consciences, since we ought to will to please God and will the reward of obedience following.
2. It refers to obedience, and this so far as God displays that to us by an urging [actu], either through special grace or a common concursus.
The first will is of complacency and is properly called will, whose object is the duty of the rational creature. In this way God sincerely [serio] approves and wills obedience, and is pleased in this moral good as a rule and norm, and it is not less a will than that which is called of good-pleasure [or the will of decree].
But the latter way is not an executing will as the will of good-pleasure is, nor does God will, intend or decree through grace or concursus, to work in the creatures that which He commands or prohibits, because He commands or prohibits it.
And in this way the will of sign is so far improperly called ‘the will of sign’; indeed, the punishment is called the wrath of God, because assuredly God punishes that which is done, as men are accustomed to do such being angry and in the passion of wrath, being aroused and agitated, although nonetheless, passions do not occur in God.
What sort is that being which a future thing maintains from eternity? I respond that it is not the being of the thing, not a real being or an actual being, because futurity is some mode of being, a mode of being not able to be real or actual… 605
By whatever mode future things have being from eternity, it surely is objective [and potential], not real. 605
Futurity and future things differ 606
The futurity of a thing is eternal and the future thing arises in time 606
Surely it is said then, futurity is in no way real? 606 I respond, futurity passively taken, or the thing which is future, is not real.
Futurity actively and passively taken differ 606
Whether the future from eternity was future from a second cause, or truly from the first cause? 607
Those things having been created in time are not able to be causes why created things were future from eternity. 607
That which is future is determinate and is necessarily future 607
Whether something was future from eternity, out of the desires of the Jesuits? I respond, not in any way [on their terms]. 608 [Rutherford’s reason is that something can only be future as it exists objectively in the decree of God, but they deny that, so their view collapses and nothing can be future.]
Whether the act, or truly the lawlessness or malice of the act may be formally prohibited? 608
Human acts, not the maliciousness or lawlessness of the acts, are formally commanded and prohibited. 608
Whether God properly dispensed with the law when He commanded Abraham to slay his only begotten son? I respond, it is not at all true. 610
God never dispenses with his law. 610
Whether it is certain that God has a positive dominion and rule in non-entities which are never created? I respond: it is most certain. 610
The dominion of God in all non-entities and those things which are never future. 610
Whether the active hardening of God is formally a positive act, or are immanent and transient acts? I respond: The will or decree to harden in God is an immanent and eternal act, but the active hardening of God, as it is the execution of that decree, is what is temporaneous and transient. 611
Active hardening in God, how far it is a positive act. 611
Whether the will of sign & the permitting will may coincide? 611
What the will of sign is in this disputation 611
Concerning decretive will 611
Additions:
Concerning a conflict in God’s will as it is falsely imputed to our side 613
There is no conflict between the wills of God. 613
The poor Disputer says that God approves something, Himself permitting 613
In what way God wills an act He is able to will. 614
Concerning the Will of Approval and the Will of Good-Pleasure, a debater is examined who says that God wills every possibility 615-620
Moreover, indeed, it is queried out of the Disputer, in what way God wills a future thing, and by what mode possibilities? whether by the same will? 615
Whether God wills possibilities. 615
That the will of God from eternity has been determined in intrinsic actions as well as extrinsic. 616
The approving will is in every way rejected by the Disputer in that sense by which it is used by us 617
The Disputer wills men to be able to break the will of God, both of good-pleasure and of sign 618
The permitting will of God does not maintain itself purely negatively around sin 619
Errata 620
Heereboord, Adrian – Philosophical Outlines [Meletemata], in which Most Things in Metaphysics are Ventilated, the Whole of Ethics… is Explained, Universal Physics is Expounded through Theorems & Commentaries, & a Sum of Logical Things is Given through Disputations… 2nd ed. (Leiden, 1659) ToC
Table of Contents
Dedicatory Epistle
To the Reader
ToC
A Collection of Logic, or [Disputations of] Logical Positions
1. On Philosophy & the Nature of Logic 1
2. On Predications in General & on Substance in Specific 2
3. On Quantity
4. On Quality
5. On Relations
6. Six Predications Following 8
7. On Predications 10
8. On a Whole & Part, & a Cause & Causation in General 11
9. On Matter, Form & End 13
10. On the Efficient Cause
11. On Subject & Adjunct
12. On Union & Distinction
13. On Opposition & Order
14. On Interpretation, Simple & Composite
15. On the Four Instruments of Knowing
A Collection of Physics
1. On the Principles of Natural Bodies 1
2. On Nature, the Efficient Cause, End, Quantity, Quality & Place
3. On Motion & Time
4. On the World & Heaven
5. On the Elements 19
6. On Generation & Corruption 23
7. On Meteors 27
8. On Mixture & Temperament 30
9. On the Soul 35
10. On the Vegetative Soul 39
11. On the Sentient Soul
12. On Sight
13. On Hearing, Smelling, Taste, Touch, etc. & Internal Sense in General 53
14. On Internal Sense in Specific, on the Sensitive & Locomotive Appetite 57
15. On the Rational Soul 62
A Collection of Ethics
1. On the Constitution of Practical Philosophy 1
2. On the Highest Good 8
3. On the Highest Good, pt. 2 13
4. On the Highest Good, pt. 3 17
5. On Spontaneity 22
[Sic] On the Highest Good, pt. 4 17
6. On Unwillingness 26
7. On Mixed Actions 31
8. On the Practical Intellect & Right Reason 35
9. On the Will 38
10. On the Motive of the Will 42
11. On Free Choice 48
12. On the Affections in General 54
13. On the Affections of Cause & Division 57
14. On Virtue in General & that of the Intellect in Specific 61
15. On Prudence 64
16. On Moral Virtue in General 68
17. On the Causes of Moral Virtue 71
18. On the Conservation, Corruption & Opposition of Moral Virtue 75
19. On the Division of Moral Virtue & the Definition of Fortitude 79
20. On the Division of, Limits of & Some Questions on, Fortitude 82
21. On Temperance 86
22. On Liberality 89
23. On the Limits & Magnificence of Liberality 93
24. On Magnanimity & Modesty 96
25. On Custom[?] 100
26. On Courtesy 105
27. On Veracity 108
28. On Buffoonery 113
29. On Universal Justice 118
30. On Particular Justice 123
31. On Friendship 132
Dedicatory Epistle 1
On the Natural Knowledge of God 21
Counsel on the Reason to Study Philosophy 27
An Academic Sermon on the Right Rule of Disputing Philosophically 29
pt. 1
Preliminaries 1, on Substance 1
Preliminaries 2, on Accidents 4
1. On Person 7
2. On Infinite Being 10
3. On the Natural Knowledge of God 14
4. On a Property [Proprio] 17
5. On Relation 21
6. On the Origin of the Rational Soul 24
7. On the Concursus of God 27
8. On the Concursus of the First Cause 30
9. On the Concursus of God 34
10. On the Concursus of the First Cause 38
11. On the Concursus of the First Cause 41
12. On Angels 44
13. On Angels 2 48
14. On Angels 3 51
15. On Angels 4 55
16. On Angels 5 58
17. On Necessity 61
18. On Contingency 62
19. 1st part, Contra the Possibility of an Eternal World 67
20. 2nd part, Contra the Possibility of an Eternal World 71
21. On the Immutability of the Divine Knowledge [Scientia] 75
22. On the Simplicity of God 78
23. On the Power of God 82
24. On the Will of God 85
25. On the Will of God Again 89
26. On the Eternity of God 93
27. On the Immutability of God 96
28. On the Immensity of God 100
29. On the Origin of a Rational Soul 104
30. On the Knowledge [Scientia] of God 107
31. On the Mode & Partition of the Divine Knowledge [Scientia] 110
32. On the Communication of Properties [Propriorum] 115
33. On Abstraction 118
34. On the Good 121
35. On Forms, pt. 1 125
36. On Forms, pt. 2 129
36. On Forms, pt. 3 134
37. On Forms, pt. 4 137
38. On the Aristotelian Definition of Form 146
39. On the Law, in Common 149
40. On the Eternal Law 152
41. On the Law of Nature 155
42. On Human Law 158
43. On the Immortality of the Rational Soul 161
44. On Innate Quality [Ingenio] 165
45. On Cognition 168
46. On a Free Cause 172
47. On a Free Cause 175
48. On Real Being 179
49. On Real Being 182
50. On Rational Being 185
pt. 2
1. On the Actual Inhering of an Accident 189
2. On the Identity of Quantity with Matter 192
3. On the Aristotelian Definition of the Highest Good & Virtue, & the Connection of Virtues 195
4. On the Distinction of an Accident from Substance, pt. 1 199
5. On the Distinction of an Accident from Substance, pt. 2 202
6. On the Distinction of an Accident from Substance, pt. 3 205
7. On the Distinction of an Accident from Substance, pt. 4 208
8. On the Distinction of an Accident from Substance, pt. 5 211
9. On the Use of Philosophy in Theology 213
10. On the Abuse of Philosophy in Theology 218
11. On the Use of Metaphysics in other disciplines, especially Theology 222
12. On the Division of the Efficient Cause into Procreating & Conserving, Eminently & Actively 225
13. On the Eminent & Crossing-Over Cause 229
14. On a Free Cause 232
15. On an Efficient Cause, in and of itself, & through an accident 238
16. On the Division of an Efficient Cause into Principle & Less Principle 241
17. On the Division of an Efficient Cause into Primary & Secondary 245
18. On the Division of an Efficient Cause into Primary & Secondary, pt. 2 248
19. On the Division of an Efficient Cause into Primary & Secondary, pt. 3 251
20. On the Division of an Efficient Cause into Primary & Secondary, pt. 4 254
21. On the Division of an Efficient Cause into Primary & Secondary, pt. 5 257
22. On the Division of an Efficient Cause into Proximate & Remote, Total & Partial 261
23. On the Final Cause 264
24. On the Final Cause, Again 267
25. On the Subject & Adjunct 270
26. On the Subject & Adjunct, pt. 2 273
27. On Agreement & Distinction 276
28. On Agreement, especially Simplicity 280
29. On the Distinction of Things 283
30. On the Distinction of Things 286
31. On Ideas, pt. 1 289
32. On Ideas, pt. 2 291
33. On Ideas, pt. 3 294
34. On Ideas, pt. 4 296
35. On Ideas, pt. 5 299
36. On Ideas, pt. 6 302
37. On the Eternal Essences of Things 305
38. On the Ordained & Absolute Power of God, pt. 1 305
39. On the Ordained & Absolute Power of God, pt. 2 308
40. On the Ordained & Absolute Power of God, pt. 3 314
41. On the Power of God 317
42. On the Power of God, Again 320
43. On the 3rd Book of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, ch. 1, texts 1 & 2 322
44. On Prime Cognition 327
45. On the Liberty of Philosophizing 330
46. On Encyclopedia 334
47. On Man 336
48. On the Reason for Philosophizing 339
49. On the Nature of Material Things 341
50. On Continuous Composition 343
An Appendix of a Certain Few Disputations held in the Theological College in the Ordinary Disputing
On Atoms 347
Contra the Fourness of the Elements, pt. 1 350
Contra the Fourness of the Elements, pt. 2 353
Contra the Same Number of the Elements, pt. 3 355
Contra the Same Number of Them, pt. 4, & specially on Air 358
On Rational Entities 401?
Whether True Philosophy is Contrary to Sacred Theology & Vice-Versa? 363
On the Use of Human Reason in Theology & Questions of Faith 368
Whether God is a Universal or Singular Subject [Thema] or Being 373
On the Origin & Progress of Philosophy 378
Ethical Exercises
1. On the Existence of Ethics & its Distinction from Theology 1
2. On the Essence & Definition of Ethics 7
3. On the Difference, Division & Use of Ethics 11
4. On the Chief Good 16
5. On the Chief Good, pt. 2 21
6. On the Chief Good, pt. 3 25
7. On the Chief Good, pt. 4 30
8. On the Chief Good, pt. 5 34
9. On the Chief Good, pt. 6 38
10. On the Subject or Object of Ethics 42
11. On Some Questions about the Intellect & Will 46
12. On Some Questions about an Act of the Human Will 49
13. On Questions about the Object of the Human Will 53
14. On Objections Against the Determination of the Human Will from the Last Judgment of the Practical Intellect 57
15. On Objections Against the Determination of the Human Will from the Last Judgment of the Practical Intellect, pt. 2 62
16. On Objections Against the Determination of the Human Will from the Last Judgment of the Practical Intellect, pt. 3 66
17. On Objections Against the Nature of Free Choice 70
18. On the Affections in General 75
19. On the Affections in Specific 79
20. On the Affections in Specific 82
21. On the Affections in Specific 87
22. On Questions about Spontaneous Actions, Unwilling & Mixed 92
23. On Good & Evil in General 95
24. On Moral Goodness & Malice 99
25. On Moral Virtue 102
26. On Moral Virtue, pt. 2 106
27. On Moral Virtue, pt. 3 109
28. On the Division of Moral Virtues & the Connection of Them Between Themselves 113
29. On the Connection or Separation of Moral Virtues, whether Equal or Unequal 117
30. On the Difference of Virtues between Gentiles & the Faithful, or Between Pagans & Christians 121
31. On the Various Division of Moral Virtues, & in Specific on the Heroic Virtue 125
32. On Human Virtue 128
33. On Some Questions about Fortitude 131
34. On Some Questions about Fortitude 134
35. On Suicide & Duelling 137
36. On Duelling 142
37. On the Question whether it may be Lawful to Repel Force with Force & to Kill an Invader 145
38. On the Question: On Account of which Things or Causes may it be Lawful to Kill an Invader? 149
39. On War, pt. 1 153
40. On War, pt. 2 160
41. On War, pt. 3 163
42. On War, pt. 4 167
43. On Questions about Temperance 169
44. On Some Questions about Temperance 172
45. On Some Questions about Liberality 177
46. On Some Questions about the Limits of Liberality & Magnificence 179
47. On Some Questions about Magnanimity & Modesty 182
48. On Some Questions about Mildness 185
49. On Some Questions about Social Virtues 188
50. On Moral Cases about Temperance 192
51. On Moral Cases about Liberality 196
52. On Moral Cases about Liberality 200
53. On Various Questions & Morals about Liberality 205
54. On Questions & Moral Cases about Magnanimity, Modesty & Mildness 209
55. On Some Moral Questions about Mildness 213
56. On Some Moral Questions about Veracity, & Specially of Falsehood 218
57. On Some Moral Questions about Veracity, & Specially of Equivocations & Mental Reservations 221
58. On Various Questions about Veracity 225
59. On Some Moral Questions about Courtesy & Bafoonery 229
60. On Some Questions about Universal Justice 233
61. On Some Questions about Particular Justice 236
62. On Some Questions about Justice, Right & Injury 241
63. On Some Questions about Friendliness 245
.
Greydanus, Johannes – Institutions of Metaphysics, in a Threefold Tract (Franeker, 1660) 434 pp. ToC Index
Greydanus (1630-1668) was a reformed professor of philosophy at Franeker.
Grebenitz, Elias – The Metaphysics of Philosophy & Theology (Frankfurt, 1677) 251 pp.
Grebenitz (1627-1689) was a reformed professor of logic, metaphysics and theology at Frankfurt.
.
Incomplete Table of Contents
Dedicatory Epistle
To the Reader
Summary ToC
General Part
Bk. 1, On Being 6
Bk. 2, On the Principles of Being 25
Bk. 3, On the Affections of Being 27
…
Special Part
Bk. 1, On the Division of Being 152
Bk. 2, [Greek] 222
.
On Particular Issues
Theological
Alsted, Johann Heinrich – A Metaphysical Disputation on Uncreated Substance (Herborne, 1615) 24 pp.
Table of Contents
Dedication 6
An Introduction to God 7
Theorem 1, Substance is a being through itself subsisting 8
Theorem 2, Substance is uncreated or created. Uncreated Substance is God. 11
Theorem 3, God is being, one, true, good, simply simple, independent and simply perfect 11
Theorem 4, One is that which is indivisible in itself and divided from every other thing 13
Theorem 5, Truth is being, congruent with the intellect, and therefore such is thus able to be conceived 15
Theorem 6, Good is being congruent with the will 6
Theorem 7, An act is either directed to an accomplishing power [potentia], or is said to be an immunity from all potential [potentia] 17
Theorem 8, An act which is more pure, that is simpler 18
Theorem 9, That which is infinite is that which by no measure is able to be measured 20
Theorem 10, Independence is that which is first, whether in some genus, or simply 22
Theorem 11, That which is perfected is that which there is known to be no addition absent from its nature 23
Theorem 12, The perfection of acts follows the perfection of essence 24
Epilogue 24
Grebenitz, Elias – On the Concurrent Being of Beings, a Metaphysical Disputation on the Concursus of the First Cause with a Second Cause (Frankfurt, 1669)
Grebenitz (1627-1689) was a reformed professor of logic, metaphysics and theology at Frankfurt.
Maccovius, Johannes – Tract on the Soul having been Separated ToC in Metaphysics, a Tract of the Same [Author] is attached on the Soul Having been Separated, now first forged (Leiden, 1650) The larger Metaphysics work is the same as that below edited by Heereboord.
1. On the Soul having been Released 341
2. On the Soul having been Brought Back 367
3. On the Separation of the Separated Soul with Respect to Accidental Properties 386
4. On the Operations of the Soul 398
5. On Considerations of the Separated Soul with respect to Itself 403
.
Non-Theological
Goclenius, Rudolf – A Twofold Philosophical Disputation: Metaphysical-Logical, on Identity & Distinction, & Physical-Medical, on the Parts of the Human Body (Marburg: 1604)
Goclenius (1547-1628) was a reformed professor of philosophy at Marburg.
Adama, Lollius – A Metaphysical Disputation on the Principle of Individuation (Franeker, 1606) 83 theses
Adama (c.1544-1609) was a reformed professor of philosophy at Franeker.
.
.
.
Related Pages