On God’s Knowledge & Omniscience

.

Subsection

Divine Ideas
Middle Knowledge

.

.

Order of Contents

Articles  16+
Knowledge of Future  1
Knowledge of Evil  1
Historical  2
Latin  4


.

.

Articles

1500’s

Zanchi, Girolamo – ch. 3, ’Of the Foreknowledge & Predestination of God’  in Confession of the Christian Religion…  (1586; Cambridge, 1599), pp. 14-18

Beza, Theodore & Anthony Faius – ch. 7, ‘Concerning the Knowlege that is in God’  in Propositions & Principles of Divinity…  (Edinburgh: Waldegrave, 1591), pp. 13-14

These were disputations defended by theological students in Geneva were held under the presiding of professors Theodore Beza and Anthony Faius.

Perkins, William – ‘God’s Counsel [Foreknowledge & Will]’  in An Exposition of the Symbol, or Apostles’ Creed…  (Cambridge, 1595), pp. 54-59

Perkins (d. 1602) was an influential, puritan, Anglican clergyman and Cambridge theologian.

.

1600’s

Alsted, Johann H. – ch. 24, ‘On the Knowledge of God’  in ‘God’s Intellect, Will, Power & Knowledge’, pp. 9-11  tr. by AI by Nosferatu  in Theologia Scholastica Didactica: Exhibens Locos Communes Theologicos Methodo Scholastica, Quatuor in partes tributa  Ref  (Conrad Eifrid, 1618)

Rutherford, Samuel – Examination of Arminianism  tr. by AI by Monergism  (1639-1642; Monergism, 2024), ch. 2, ‘On God’  Latin

Title 1, On the Knowledge [Cognitione] of God: 1. Whether or not a living and right knowledge of God is commanded?  We affirm against the Remonstrants, pp. 155-57

Title 4, On God’s Knowledge [Scientia], pp. 176-79

11. Whether there is a middle knowledge in God.  We deny against the Jesuits and Arminians

12. Whether God foreknows future contingencies with certainty.  We affirm against the doubting Remonstrants.

Voet, Gisbert

Select Theological Disputations, vol. 1, pt. 1  tr. by AI by Onku  (Utrecht: Johannes a Waesberg, 1648)  Latin

On God’s Own Knowledge  236
On the Conditioned or Middle Knowledge in God, pt. 1  251
.      pt. 2  258
.      pt. 3  268
.      pt. 4  286

Leigh, Edward – ch. 7, ‘Of God’s Understanding, that He is Omniscient, & of his Will’  in A System or Body of Divinity…  (London, A.M., 1654), bk. 2, pp. 160-67

Baxter, Richard – Catholic Theology  (London: White, 1675)

4. God’s relations to the creature and denominations (thereupon) in his power, knowledge and will
5. Futurity and its pretended causes
6. God’s knowledge, and the co-existence of the creature
7. School curiosities and uncertainties about God’s knowledge
8. More of God’s foreknowledge and of permission of sin

Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Louis – ‘Divine knowledge: that which is in God and the object of it’  in Theological Theses Published at Various Times in the Academy  of Sedan  3rd ed.  tr. by AI by Colloquia Scholastica at Discord  (1675; London, 1683), pp. 214-19  Latin

Le Blanc (1614-1675) was a French reformed professor of theology at Sedan.

Charnock, Stephen – Discourse 8, ‘On God’s Knowledge’  in Discourses upon the Existence & Attributes of God, vol. 1  (d. 1680; NY: Robert Carter, 1853), vol. 1, pp. 406-98

Owen, John – ch. 5, ‘Of God’s Prescience or Foreknowledge’  in Vindiciae Evangelicae; Or the Mystery of the Gospel Vindicated & Socinianism Examined  (1655)  in Works, 12.108-40

Turretin, Francis – 12. ‘Do all things fall under the knowledge of God, both singulars and future contingencies?  We affirm against Socinus.’  in Institutes of Elenctic Theology, tr. George M. Giger, ed. James Dennison Jr.  (1679–1685; P&R, 1992), vol. 1, 3rd Topic, pp. 206-34

van Mastricht, Peter – 13. ‘The Intellect, Knowledge & Wisdom of God’  in Theoretical-Practical Theology  ed. Joel Beeke, tr: Todd Rester  (RHB, 2018), vol. 2, Faith in the Triune God, pt. 1, bk. 2, pp. 251-79

.

1700’s

Abernethy, John – Sermon 9, ‘The True Notion of Divine Omniscience, of its Nature, Manner & Extent’  on Ps. 147:5  in Discourses concerning the Being & Natural Perfections of God  3rd ed.  (London: H. Whitridge, 1757), vol. 1, pp. 288-326

Abernethy (1680-1740) was reformed and was an Irish, presbyterian minister.

De Moor, Bernard – Continuous Commentary  (d. 1780), ch. 4, ‘On God’

15. God as Intelligent Substance

34. Divine Knowledge
35. God’s Knowledge, a Most Pure Act
35. God’s Knowledge Eternal & Self-Sufficient
35. Perfection of God’s Knowledge
35. Perfection of God’s Knowledge Asserted from Hebrews 4:13
35. Perfection of God’s Knowledge Asserted from Romans 11 (by Voetius)
36. God’s Knowledge of All Things
36. God’s Knowledge of Himself
36. God’s Knowledge of All Things Possible, & of All Universals & Particulars
36. God’s Knowledge of Thing Great & Small, Good & Evil
36. God’s Knowledge of the Hidden Things of the Heart
36. God’s Knowledge of Free & Contingent Futures
36. The Socinian Denial of God’s Knowledge of Free & Contingent Futures
36. Remonstrant Hesitation concerning God’s Knowledge of Free and Contingent Futures
36. Answering Objections to God’s Knowledge of Free & Contingent Futures, pt. 123
37. God’s Knowledge of Vision, & of Simple Intelligence
37. Defense of God’s Knowledge of Vision, & of Simple Intelligence
38. Advocates of the Doctrine of Middle Knowledge
38. Verbal Dispute among the Reformed over Middle Knowledge
38. Middle Knowledge: Definitions & Clarification of the Question
38. Refutation of the Doctrine of Middle Knowledge
39. Answering the Molinists, pt. 12
40. God’s Knowledge not properly the Cause of Things

Venema, Herman – ‘On God’s Understanding’  in Translation of Hermann Venema’s inedited Institutes of Theology  tr. Alexander W. Brown  (d. 1787; Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1850), ch. 6, ‘Attributes of God’, pp. 145-55

Venema (1697-1787) was a professor at Franeker.  Venema “maintained the fundamental line of confessional orthodoxy without drawing heavily on any of the newer philosophies…  and maintained a fairly centrist Reformed position.  Venema… evidence[s] the inroads of a rationalistic model…” – Richard Muller

.

2000’s

Feser, Edward – ‘Omniscience’  in ch. 6, ‘The Nature of God & of his Relationship to the World’  in Five Proofs of the Existence of God  (Ignatius Press, 2017), pp. 208-16


.

.

On God’s Knowledge of the Future

Historical

On Thomism

Quote

Allan B. Wolter, Little Summary of Metaphysics (Milwaukee: Bruce Publishing Co., 1958), p. 98, fn. 28

“A distinction must be made between the doctrine of Thomas himself and that of Thomists [i.e. Banesians], for according to Aquinas God knows the future by reason of his eternity, for by virtue of his eternity God is present to every moment of time, whether that moment is present, past, or future (ST Ia q.14 a.13).

By contrast, Scotus rather than Thomas was of the opinion that God knows creatures that are actual by decrees of his will. The opinion of the Banesians is founded on this opinion of Scotus, to which they add the principle rejected by Scotus that ‘whatever is moved is moved by another’.”


.

.

On God’s Knowledge of Evil

Quote

1900’s

Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange

Reality: a Synthesis of Thomistic Thought  (St. Louis: Herder, 1950), ch. 9, God’s Knowledge, p. 99  Lagrange was a Neo-Thomist.

“This divine knowlege [of what God decrees] is the cause of things, since it is united to God’s free will, which, among all possible things, chooses one particular thing to exist rather than another.  God’s knowledge of possible things, since it presupposes no decree of the divine will, is called simple intelligence.  But his knowledge of actual things, since it does presuppose such a decree, is called ‘knowledge of approbation,’ approbation, not of evil, but of all that is real and good in the created universe.

How then does God know evil?  He knows it by its opposition to the good wherein alone evil can exist.  Hence God knows evil by knowing what He permits, what He does not hinder.  No evil, physical or moral, can come to be unless, for a higher good, God permits it to be.  Knowing what He permits, God knows by that permission all evil that has been, is, or will ever be.”


.

.

Historical

On the Middle Ages

Hoenen, M.J.F.M. – Marsilius of Inghen: Divine Knowledge in Late Medieval Thought  in Studies in the History of Christian Thought, vol. 50  Buy  Ref  (Brill, 1992)  287 pp.

Kelley, Carl Franklin – Meister Eckhart on Divine Knowledge  (Yale Univ. Press, 1977)  300 pp.  ToC

.

On the Post-Reformation

Muller, Richard – in PRRD, vol. 3

Heppe

1800’s Lutheran Anthology


.

.

Latin Articles

1500’s

Zanchi, Jerome – ch. 2, ‘Of the Knowledge [Scientia] or Wisdom, and Foreknowledge of God’  ToC  in Of the Nature & Attributes of God, bk. 3, ‘The Attributes’  in The Theological Works, vol. 2  (Heidelberg, 1577; n.d.)

Zanchi (1516-1590)

.

1600’s

Voet, Gisbert

Syllabus of Theological Problems  (Utrecht, 1643), pt. 1, section 1, tract 2, I. ‘Of God’, 4. Attributes of God in Specific, 2nd Kind  Abbr.

(1) Intellect or Knowledge [Scientia] of God
.        Appendix: Of Ideas in God

Disputation 14, ‘Of the Knowledge [Scientia] of God’  in Select Theological Disputations  (Utrecht: Waesberg, 1648-1669), vol. 1, pp. 246-64

.

1700’s

Holtzfus, Barthold – A Theological Tract on God, Attributes & the Divine Decrees, Three Academic Dissertations  (1707)  210 pp.

6. Of the Life, Intellect & Knowledge [Scientia] of God  55
7. Of the Distinctions in Divine Knowledge [Scientiae], in Theory & in Practice, Natural & Free, of the Knowledge of Simple Intelligence & Vision, & so of Conditional, Middle Knowledge & of the Wisdom of God  71-106

Holtzfus (1659-1717) was a reformed professor of philosophy and theology at Frankfurt.

Roy, Albert – Theological Exercitation 23 on the Knowledge [Scientia] of God  (Bern, 1717)

Roy (1663-1733) was a reformed, professor of Hebrew, Catechesis and theology at Lausanne, Switzerland.

.

.

.

Related Pages

Of God, his Attributes & Man’s Knowledge of God

Divine Ideas in God

God is Pure Act

Simplicity of God

Perfection of God

Infinity of God

Affections of of God

Absolute & Relative Attributes

Incomprehensibility of God

Power of God

Christ did not Experience the Beatific Vision in his Earthly Life

Against the Ubiquity & Multi-Presence of Christ’s Human Nature

On the Communication of the Properties of Christ’s Human & Divine Natures

Christ’s Mediatorial Operations, Divine & Human, unto the Same Work

On the Person of Christ, his Human & Divine Natures & the Hypostatic Union

Will We ‘See’ God’s Essence?