Order of Contents
Collections of Articles
Order of Contents
Rijssen, Leonard – A Complete Summary of Elenctic Theology & of as Much Didactic Theology as is Necessary tr. J. Wesley White MTh thesis (Bern, 1676; GPTS, 2009)
Ch. 2, Holy Scripture
Controversy – ‘Are the Apocryphal books part of Holy Scripture, and do they have divine authority for establishing and confirming articles of faith? We deny against the Papists and the Anabaptists.’ p. 11
Controversy – ‘Can there be an article of faith that is not contained in Scripture in exact words but is drawn from it by consequence? We affirm against the Socinians and Anabaptists.’ pp. 14-15
Controversy – ‘Are the books of the O.T. also canon for Christians, and do arguments taken from them have the same authority as those from the N.T.? We affirm against the Socinians and Anabaptists.’ pp. 17-18
Ch. 3, God
Controversy 1 – ‘Are the words substance, essence, nature, and persons of the Trinity rightly predicated of God? We affirm against the Anabaptists.’ p. 29
Controversy 1 – ‘Is God present by His essence in every place in the world? We affirm against the Socinians, Anabaptists, and Arminians.’ p. 35
Controversy 2 – ‘Is the essence of God finite, and does it contain certain imperfections (crimines)? We deny against the same.’ pp. 35-36
Ch. 9, The Law, the Fall & Sin
Controversy – ‘Did man before the fall have the promises of a blessed life and the glory of heaven? We affirm against the Socinians and Anabaptists.’ pp. 83-84
Controversy – ‘Is there original sin? Or, is every man except Christ born a sinner? We affirm against the Socinians, Anabaptists, and Arminians.’ p. 88
Controversy – ‘Did all men sin in Adam in such a way that this sin should be reckoned as the sin of all? We affirm against the Socinians, Anabaptists, Arminians, and certain Frenchmen.’ pp. 89-90
Ch. 10, The Covenant of Grace
Controversy 3 – ‘Were the fathers of the Old Testament participants of the same covenant, and did they have the same spiritual promises? We deny against the Socinians, Anabaptists, and Arminians.’ pp. 109-110
Ch. 11, Christ
Controversy 1 – ‘Is Christ a true man? We affirm against the Anabaptists.’ pp. 117-18
Controversy 2 – ‘Did Christ have his flesh from the substance and blood of the Virgin Mary? We affirm against the Anabaptists.’ P. 118
Controversy 3 – ‘Was Mary, then, of the tribe of Judah? We affirm against the same.’ pp. 118-19
Ch. 15, The Decalogue & Good Works
Controversy 1 on the 3rd Commandment – ‘Is a Christian man permitted to swear an oath or to call on God as a witness in urgent necessities? We affirm against the Anabaptists.’ p. 182
Controversy 1 on the 5th Commandment – ‘Is it permitted for a Christian man to serve in the government or rule a republic? We affirm against the Socinians and Anabaptists.’ pp. 188-89
Controversy 2 on the 5th Commandment – ‘Is the magistrate permitted to shed the blood of wicked men? We affirm against the same.’ p. 189
Controversy 3 on the 5th Commandment – ‘Are Christian magistrates permitted to wage war both in itself and for defending their country against enemies by force and arms? We affirm against the Socinians and Anabaptists.’ pp. 189-90
Controversy on the 6th Commandment – ‘Is a Christian man permitted to defend his life by force and arms against robbers and invaders? We affirm against the same.’ pp. 190-91
Controversy on the 8th Commandment – ‘Should all the goods of every Christian be held in common with all others? We deny against certain Anabaptists.’ p. 192
Ch. 16, The Church
Controversy 4 – ‘Do Bishops exist by divine right? In other words, did Christ institute as Pastor anyone who would have power in other Churches or Rulers of Churches whose power alone it would be to call Pastors, administer sacraments, and exercise discipline? We deny against the Papists, the Anabaptists, and others.’ pp. 214-15
Controversy 8 – ‘Are Ministers or Pastors of the Church owed a wage? We affirm against the Anabaptists.’ p. 217
Controversy – ‘Are ecclesiastical censures, especially the highest, in their essence in the power of the whole Church? We deny against the Anabaptists and Independents.’ p. 221
Ch. 17, The Sacraments
Controversy 1 – ‘Are sacraments not merely signs and shadows of divine grace but also seals that seal grace? We affirm against the Socinians, Anabaptists, and Papists.’ pp. 222-23
Controversy 3 – ‘Can the sacraments, especially baptism, be administered by anyone, including women? We deny against the Papists, Socinians, Arminians, and Anabaptists.’ pp. 224-25
Controversy 5 – ‘Should the infants of believers be baptized? We affirm against the Socinians and Anabaptists.’ pp. 229-30
Controversy 7 – ‘Should a Christian man who was once baptized in a legitimate way be baptized again later? We deny against the Anabaptists.’ p. 231
Ch. 18, Last Things
Controversy 2 on the life of souls – ‘Do souls that are separated from their bodies live and have knowledge and sense? We affirm against the Socinians and Anabaptists.’ p. 244
Turretin, Francis – Institutes of Elenctic Theology, tr. George M. Giger, ed. James Dennison Jr. (1679–1685; P&R, 1992),
8. ‘Are the books of the Old Testament still a part of the canon of faith and rule of practice in the Church of the New Testament? We affirm against the Anabaptists.’ 98-102
3. ‘Is the moral law so perfect a rule of life and morals that nothing can be added to it or ought to be corrected in it for the true worship of God? Or did Christ fulfill it not only as imperfect, but also correct it as contrary to his doctrines? The former we affirm; the latter we deny against the Socinians, Anabaptists, Remonstrants and papists.’ 18
5. ‘Was the covenant of grace one and the same as to substance under each dispensation? We affirm against the Socinians, Anabaptists and Remonstrants.’ 192
5. ‘Was the human nature assumed by the Logos like ours in all respects (sin excepted) and his flesh taken from the substance of the blessed virgin; or did it come down from heaven? The former we affirm; the latter we deny against the Anabaptists.’ 306
28. ‘Is any salary due ministers of the church? We affirm against the Anabaptists.’ 269
20. ‘Should the infants of covenanted believers be baptized? We affirm against the Anabaptists.’ 414
For a brief intro and some quotes from this work, see the article (very slanted from the view of Anglicanism) by Bradford Littlejohn, ‘Calvin Against the Anabaptists’.
Treatises against the Anabaptists & against the Libertines: Translation, Introduction & Notes tr. Benjamin Farley (Baker Academic, 1982) 325 pp. ToC The work here against the Anabaptists is the same as above.
de Bres, Guy – The Rise, Spring & Foundation of the Anabaptists, or Re-baptized of our Time trans. J. S. (1565; Cambridge [Mass.]: Marmaduke Johnson, 1668) 70 pp. White font on a black background. The display of pages is irregular at the beginning, but no pages are missing.
de Bres (1522-1567) was a Walloon pastor, reformer, theologian and a student of Calvin and Beza in Geneva. He was martyred at age 45. de Bres was the compiler and publisher of what is now known as the Belgic Confession today (1561).
This work was reprinted for the puritan New England context.
Table of Contents
The Rise, Spring & Foundation of the Anabaptists 1
Of the Deams of the Anabaptists & how they are Condemned by the Word of God 47
Of the Spiritual Anabaptists, who are Separated from the World 53-8
Bullinger, Henry – A Wholesome Antidote or Counter-Poisen, Against the Pestilent Heresy & Sect of the Anabaptists… (1548) 230 pp. in 10 Dialogues
Featley, Daniel – The Dippers Dipped, or, the Anabaptists Ducked & Plunged over Head & Ears, at a Disputation in Southwark: together with a Large & Full Discourse of their 1. Original. 2. Several Sorts. 3. Peculiar Errors. 4. High Attempts Against the State. 5. Capital Punishments, with an Application to These Times (London, 1645) ToC IA
Featley (1582-1645) was a Calvinist, episcopal, Westminster divine.
Spanheim, Frederic – England’s Warning by Germany’s Woe: or a Historical Narration of the Original, Progress, Tenets, Names & Several Sects of the Anabaptists in Germany & the Low Countries.. from 1521… wherein is Set Forth their Several Errors (London: John Dever & Robert Ibbitson, 1646) 50 pp. no ToC
Spanheim (1600–1649) was a reformed professor of philosophy and theology at Geneva and Leiden.
Reading, John – Anabaptism Routed, or a Survey of the Controverted Points… Together with a Particular Answer to All that is Alleged in Favor of the Anabaptists by Dr. Jeremy Taylor, in his book called, The Liberty of Prophesying (London: Thomas Johnson, 1655) 204 pp.
Reading (c.1587-1667) was a reformed Anglican minister.
Barry, James – A Brief & Plain Discovery of the Falseness & Unscripturalness of Anabaptism: as the Same is Now Practised by Those of that Persuasion… 3rd ed. (London, 1715) 210 pp. No ToC, except the extended title
Barry (fl.1650-1702) was a reformed puritan.
On the History of Anabaptism
On the Precedents & Origins of Anabaptism
The Dippers Dipped, or, the Anabaptists Ducked & Plunged… (London, 1645), pp. 25 & 27
“The third [sort of Anabaptists, after the two from the Early Church] broached theirs in the year 1525, which was this, (3) that baptism ought to be administred to none, but such as can give a good account of their faith; and in case any have been baptized in their infancy, that they ought to be re-baptized after they come to years of discretion, before they are to be admitted to the church of Christ.
For the third sort of Anabaptists, they have sunk deeper in the
former quagmire… For they not only nullify all baptism administered either by Romish priests, or orthodox Protestants, but condemn [the] baptizing of children simply, which neither the first nor the second sort of Anabaptists [in the Early Church] did; for both the Novatians and Donatists, yea, and Pelagians too, though they denied original sin, yet they all allowed and practised the baptism of infants.
The author of this third and worst sect of Anabaptists, was, as some say Muncerus; as others, Balthasar Pacimontanus, against whom Zwingli wrote; as others, Carolstadius; but I subscribe to Melancthou, who lived in those times… And he affirms, as I said before, that Nicholas Stock was the first that broached Anabaptism in Germany. This Stock affirmed, that God spake to him by an angel, and revealed his will to him in dreams, promising him the place of the angel Gabriel: in this man’s school was Thomas Muncer bred…”
Lang, Andrew – ‘Knox on the Anabaptists: his Appeal to England: 1558-1559’ in Lang, John Knox & the Reformation
Alsted – Compendium of Theology
Syllabus of Theological Problems (Utrecht, 1643), pt. 1,
section 1, tract 3, First Table, Exhibiting the False Judgments or Opinions of Papists, Remonstrants, Socinians & Anabaptists… Abbr.
7. On Sanctification: the Catechism of the Remonstrants, #46, says, ‘From God being constituted the Author of Salvation, it is impossible for those which are knowing eternal life & are believing in Jesus, all which obey Him & are not able otherwise to evade eternal damnation, etc., all studiously seeking this way, not to come to obtaining eternal life.’
section 2, tract 4
section 2, tract 5
49. ‘A Disputation: Some Miscellaneous Positions’ in Select Theological Disputations (Amsterdam: Jansson, 1667), pp. 745-63
A Catalogue of the Errors of the Anabaptists
The Dippers Dipped, or, the Anabaptists Ducked & Plunged… (London, 1645), Ch. 2, ‘Of the Errors of the Anabaptists, both common to other sects, and those which are peculiarly their own’, pp. 28-32
“First, their ecclesiasticall errors, such as peculiarly concern the doctrine or discipline of the Church are:
First, that Christ took not flesh from the Virgin Mary, but
that he passed through her as the sun beams do through glass, or rain through a spout.
Secondly, that there is no original sin.
Thirdly, that children ought not to be baptized.
Fourthly, that such as have been baptized in their infancy
ought to be re-baptized when they come to years of discretion.
Fifthly, that lay-people may preach and administer the
Sixthly, that men have free will, not only in natural and
moral, but also in spiritual actions.
Seventhly, that absolution and the church-peace ought to
be denied to such who are fallen into any grievous sin; yea, though they repent of it.
Eighthly, that Luther’s doctrine is worse than the Pope’s.
Secondly, their politicall errors, or in matter of state, are:
First, that the people may depose their magistrates and
Secondly, that a Christian with a good conscience may not
take upon him, or bear the office of a magistrate, or keep any court of justice.
Thirdly, that none may administer an oath to another.
Fourthly, that no malefactors ought to be put to death.
Thirdly, their economical errors [about the family] are:
First, that no man has a propriety in his goods, but that
all things ought to be held in common.
Secondly, that it is lawful to have more wives than one at
Thirdly, that a man may put away his wife if she differ
from him in point of religion, and be not of their sect.
All the errors of the Anabaptists are of two sorts:
First, such as they hold in common with other heretics.
Secondly, such as are peculiar to their sect.
First, concerning the common errors [not mentioned above]…
First, with the Millenaries and their joint issue is, that
Christ before the day of judgement shall come down from Heaven, and reign with the saints upon earth a thousand years; in which time they shall destroy all the wicked, binding their kings in chains, and their nobles in links of iron.
Thirdly, with the Donatists and their joynt issue is that
in the true church there are no scandals, or lewd and vicious livers; that the church of Christ is confined to their sect; that we ought to separate from all assemblies of Christians wherein there are any abuses or scandals, yea, though the church allows them not, but seeks to reform them; that all such as have been baptized by any other than those of their sect, ought to be rebaptized.
Seventhly, with the Enthusiasts and their joint issue is
that the Scripture is not our only rule of faith and manners, but
that God reveals his will to his children at this day by visions
Ninthly, with the Arminians and their joint issue is, that there is no original sin, or at least, that none is damned for it alone; that election is upon foreseen faith and repentance; that God gives all men sufficient grace to be saved; that man has free-will of himself either to accept or refuse God’s grace; that Christ died indifferently for all; that a true beleever, who is in the state of grace, may fall away totally and finally.
Tenthly, with the Brownists or Barrowists and their joint issue is,
that there ought to be a parity in the church… that in regard of these and such like abuses and corruptions [in ceremonies and governemnt] the church of England is no true Church of Christ, and consequently, that all that have a care of their soules must of necessity separate from her.
Eleventhly, with a peculiar sect, called the Separati and their
joint issue is, that no Christian may go to law, or in any case to
right himself by arms or violent means.
Secondly, such [errors] as are peculiar to their sect, and these are six:
Thirdly, that there ought to be no set form of Liturgy or prayer by the book, but only by the Spirit.
Fourthly, that there ought to be no distinction by the Word of God between the clery and the laity, but that all who are gifted may preach the Word and administer the sacraments.
Fifthly, that it is not lawful to take an oath at all, no, not though it be demanded by the magistrate…”
Contra Anabaptism on Predestination
Knox, John – An Answer to the Cavillations of [an Anabaptist] Adversary Respecting the Doctrine of Predestination (1560) in The Works of John Knox, 5:7-468
“While living in Geneva about 1558, Knox was asked by persons back in England to answer a book circulating there titled Careless by Necessity. This work, written by an Anabaptist, denied the doctrine of Predestination. Knox complied…
This work is the longest of Knox’s writings… On Predestination is in the form of an ‘answer’, and is disputational in structure. Knox alternately [block] quotes an assertion from his ‘Adversarie’ [in the order of the adversary’s book] immediately following it with his ‘Answer’.” – Brian L. Dole, ‘John Knox on Predestination’
See extended excerpts from this work, the font of which is otherwise difficult to read, at, Excerpts from John Knox’s Work on Predestination.